Thank you, sir. And, well: Thank you, sir. And, well done, tapping into my mindset. There are definitely elements of all that you imagined influencing the poem, playing somewhat as metaphor for figures in the real world, while also attempting to express the way that - as ever - "(super)heroes" are often mirrors of a culture.
Love does not play by other people's rules: Sometimes, not even your own. A creation that takes on a life of it's own, once we give it the spirit of life. In essence, it is like a child, in that even when gone astray, an open heart will always care. I think, these sentiments, as best I can express them right now, you portray both without restraint and with poetic beauty. You do not betray, for a moment, the pureness of love despite devastated commitment.
Wishing you all the best.
Wow! I applaud . . . I: Wow! I applaud . . . I mean, APPLAUD . . . this poem, not only for its content, but for the way your quatrains consistently deploy their form and rhynme scheme.
This may be an awkward: This may be an awkward comment, but I am going to try to express what I think is the high significance of this poem. During my senior year, History majors was required to take a class on the Philosophy of History. There, we did not study some particular historical sequence: rather, we studied the ways historical theories were presented, and the perspectives from which historians viewed their chosen eras and events. One's senior thesis was written under the auspices of this class; and one did not graduate without the successful completion of the senior thesis.
I said all that to say this: This poem is one of the finest theoretical summaries of the historical process that I have ever encountered. It is not only among the very finest that I have read, I also believe it deserves to be taught. They tell me that when the great poet, Wallace Stevens (himself a lawyer) was mentoring a certain young man through law school, he would tell him, in regard to the various courses required, that each course had a particular supreme point to present, and that by finding and studying that point, he (the student) would be able to organize his reading, his papers, and his examination answers around it. And this poem presents a point that is not only appropriate, profoundly appropriate, for a senior class on Philosophy of History, it is also a reading method that a freshman History major would find useful and practical when approaching the subject as a new major.
And, finally, I will say that, although I wish I could have read this poem (I dare not say, I wish I could have actually been smart enough to think the way this poem directs) during my collegiate days, I am glad I have lived long enough to be able to read it now (although my visit is a little behind schedule due to my circumstances). You should be very, very, very proud of this poem; it is one of the centerpieces of your entire collection on this site; and it is further proof of what I most sincerely believe, that you are one of the Pillars of the PostPoems community.
If I recall correctly from as: If I recall correctly from as far back as my senior year in high school, the great Poet, John Milton, believed that poems are to teach as well as beautify the language. What may seem vague can actually provide a learning opportunity to a reader; and your references and allusions will provide those opportunities. I have seen much spiritual insight in both your poems and your comments, so I think you are one of those Poets of whom Milton wrote. I regret that my circumstances do not always allow me to keep up with your poems in a timely fashion, but I am glad to catch up whenever I can.
Thank you. The insights: Thank you. The insights contained in your comments never fail to have a double effect: they always amaze me, and they always instruct me.
A temptation known only to: A temptation known only too well in my life's journey. The one saving grace being the realisation that the Lord himself did not wear a badge of any one particular sect or denomination. That quickly refocuses the tendency to 'nominate,' in my experience.
Thank you, but if you look: Thank you, but if you look closely at my reply you will see that I already made a fool of myself. I meant to write 18th dynasty and wrote, instead, 18th century. The Aten movement in Egypt, during the last of its 18th dynasty, had long been forgotten by the 18th century. It was only beginning to be rediscovered in the late 19th century. But thank you for tolerating my blunder, and for your kind words.
And so much truer when the: And so much truer when the significant other other comes to the knowing that not only what they want but also what they need! A true pleasure to read and absorb.
Thank you for sharing that: Thank you for sharing that with me. I love your comments---always a theological or spiritual aspect that refreshes and uplifts me.
My nan was a stickler for the: My nan was a stickler for the outward observations of faith. As an elementary schooler I tried to circumvent going to church one week by having only with me my swimming trunks and she towed me to church in that with a nice shirt and flipflops. The 'calling' part would 'spontaneously' arrive in the succeeding years.