PostPoems Be Artistic. Be Creative. Be Inspired!

This reminds me of an: This reminds me of an experiece I had in sixth grade.  Two years before, I had "discovered" that my beloved Frankenstein films that were broadcast from time to time on Shock Theater on Saturday afternoons (the old B/W Universal Studios productions) were not just improvised by the actors, but had been based upon an idea in a novel by Mary Shelley (who was not quite nineteen years old when she thought of it, and was twenty-one when it was published).  Her example made me want to be a writer.  So, in that sixth grade class, we were assigned to write a short story, and I wrote about a rather formidable creature from mythology, but I dumbed the monster down so that it was friendly.  The paper was returned by my teacher, with a remark scrawled across it in red pencil, "This is poor taste."  Flash forward to January 2001:  my first internet publication happened in London, England, when a poem of mine was accepted by a very strict board of directors who were scholars of the so-called Jack the Ripper murders.  My poem attempted to explain the five anomalies of the fifth and final murder.   Any theory can explain one, some theories successfully explain two, but none explain all five.  Mine did; it is still on that site, as well as on PostPoems, and my theory has never been overturned.  (It was once plagiarized by a writer who thought it had been fully proven, but I had to advise her that it was still "just a theory" lacking objective evidence; just a thought exercise without forensic authentication.  She did take steps to cite it properly in a footnote, rather than just quote it.)  I never had a chance to show that to my sixth grade teacher, who had probably croaked by that time, but I hope she knows it now . . . wherever she happens to be.    I hope I am not stretching credibility too far by comparing, broadly not specifically, my experience to yours.  I suspect it happens to many, many children.  When my stepson was in middle school, he was assigned to write a paper on Adolf Hitler, using library materials not a home encyclopedia.  I drove him to our area's local university, made him look up several texts, and watched him as he wrote his paper there.  (He did have quite an eye for the collegiate beauties who were moving about the room, and I had to repeatedly remind him to keep his eyes on his paper.)  I proofread the paper and made sure his punctuation was correct.  He was the only student in his class to use a university library, which gave him some status that week.  However the paper was returned with an A minus, although no other marks or comments had been put upon it.  I knew it was an A plus paper because I had supervised it.  He was crushed by the "minus."  The next day, I called the Principal from my office, advised him of the situation, and demanded that he find out why the paper did not achieve A+.  He told me that the teacher had refused to comment further.  I then asked the principal if the teacher would meet with me, in the principal's office, for an in-depth discussion of the history of the Third Reich---and I told the principal that I had probably forgotten more about Hitler than that teacher had ever learned.  The teacher flatly refused to meet with me, he flatly refused to change the grade, and the principal refused to compel the grade change.  This so disgusted my stepson that he began to give up entirely, and as soon as he turned sixteen, he dropped out.  Good teachers are educators; mediocre teachers are mis-educators; and bad teachers, like my son's history teacher, are ignorizers.