Our society is, as you may have imagined, rather
exclusive---a custom both traditional to among
us, historically, and eminently practical as an
enhancement to our safety and continued
existence. I have always taken a perhaps
inordinate pride in my administration of our
society's affairs, conducting our business
with iron resolve and an ungloved fist when
necessary; tyrannical and dictatorial as that
may seem to an outsider, it is an aspect of
our homeland (which sometimes is noted in the
various newspapers of the present day) that we,
who have preserved its traditions so far as we
are able, find unremarkable. And, I might
suggest, it is as practical as the system of
government in this---your---country: which
pays lip service to a queen who reigns but
does not rule; and decisions are referred to an
assembled rabble who delight to call themselves
Commons; and whose predecessors lost their
greatest colonial possession to an assembly of
yokels, peasants, and disgruntled planters and
lawyers, who like their counterparts here, talked
entirely too much. Oh no, none of that silliness
for us. But, I should have heeded the others'
strenous and repetitious objections to the
admission of our newest member, to whom I
shall refer to (if you will permit me the
inaccuracy) as Dorian, the appellation given
him by an acquaintance of his who is, by
wildest chance (ah!, the bon mot) a poet of
some notoriety in your great city. Young
Dorian was most anxious to be accepted
amon us: he offered the sacrifice required of
all who receive my considered approbation
prior to the communal act of initiation---
after, of course, a thorough investigation.
Dorian was enthusiastically flamboyant,
not hesitating to plunge his teeth into
full, even frantic, participation. Many of us,
due to age or other personal inclination,
have forgotten the precipitate enthusiasms of
youthfulness. A child beginning to walk must, of the
nature of the process, fail at first and fall;
but the careful parent does not impose a
punishment for those stumbles, no matter how
numerous---provided a development can be,
eventually, noticed. So I believed in regard to
Dorian; and I admit that I, who am often
accused of feeling nothing, felt both fatherly and
protective toward him; even defending him
against the suspicions (which later became
justifable complaints) of the others. His foibles---
his flaunted violations of our mutually protectice
practices---were not many, but were, none the
less, remarkable, commencing in the summer
(specifically, in August) of the year we had received
him, and admitted him to our companionship.
Three times he brought undue attention to his---
shall we say---excitements. And, after the third,
I reprimanded him, thoroughly, and explicitly,
while he stared, as if bored, into the distance and,
when i had finished my speech (one could hardly
have called it a conversation, one-sided as it had to be),
he snuffed out the candles with a dismissive air and
took his leave with a disrespectul gesture meant to
elicit an offended response from me. I did not,
however, wish to stoop to his level---which, despite my
anger, I sought to ascribe to mere circumstances:
his callow age, a bad time recently, or mere
low-spirited high jinks which are often the hallmark of
immaturity, although not always its conscientous
intention. The fourth incident, a double helping
(so to speak)---was, among all of us, deemed a
flagrant disregard of our circle's security
(since such carelessness often draws the
attention of those who have a vested interest in
both opposing and harming us). Still, I procrastinated,
hoping that he would offer his own repentence and
recognition of such distinct disegard for the good of
all of us. I understood the thrill of destruction---
I have enjoyed all of its many varieties---but subtlety,
even discretion, is the foremost requirement of the
destroyer. Anything less--and Dorian's trespasses
were far worse than merely less---was mere mayhem,
intentionally disrupting the camouflage and covert
restrains by which our continued presence in London
might be assured and expanded. By that time, the
police authorities had invested much time and effort in
detecting the culprint and the cause, although, understandibly,
Dorian had eluded them. Even (so I was told later), the
old queen herself, she who reigned without ruling, who was
constrained by rules established by the undignified Commons,
had asserted an opinion, even to the implied reprimand of
one of her ministers, and the commissioner who answered to
him. The situation had become intolerable, and compelled
me to admit that Dorian's admission was a regretable, but it was
(so the others reminded me, with brutal and suggestive candor)
correctible. Still, a reluctance hampered me, and despite the
impatience of those I had long ago sworn to serve, I failed to
accede, immediately, to their demands to act, and to act
decisively and without either clemency or sympathy. But the
fifth abuse---the unnecessary mutilation of the Kelly woman---
bestirred such a sense of disgust in me that I could not longer
remain quiescent. I dismembered him, in the same
extensive way; but more efficiently and not susceptible to
ordinary detection. I scattered the fragments of him all
over the city---from Whitechapel, where he had struck his
last, to Buckingham. Relieved of the threat implicit in his
antics, we have continued our lifestyle---or is it, more
precisely, a deathstyle?---without fear of disruption or
intrusion by those who think they can mount a defense
against us. Polidori, Lefanu, and Stoker notwithstanding,
we are as rare as honest politicians and as voracious as bedbugs.
There's a limit to the gore
There's a limit to the gore and splatter one can abide, even in good old Whitechapel. Thank you for the Ripper short story.
My Secret River
Thank you very much for the
Thank you very much for the comment. Although I, personally, do not believe that Mary Kelly was actually the fifth victim (although intended, by the assailant to be), I suspended my disbelief in order to cast it as a vampire tale. I have read, elsewhere, that certain scholars have suggested that the Ripper murders, and not Central European horror stories (and not a too generous helping of crab cake) was the actual inspiration of Stoker's novel, Dracula, The connection to Wilde's novel, which the poem suggests, is entirely a fictional construct, to the best of my knowledge.
Starward