This is an excellent exegesis on a difficult problem that confounds many preachers who attempt to present a hayseed solution to it. Several years ago, I actually heard a preacher (whose preaching, since then, I avoid whenever I can) state that God, Whose Word is forever settled in Heaven, and Who has no respect of persons, made a momentary exception in the Law of Moses to allow Jephthah to actually kill his daughter to the glory of the Lord. The only human sacrifice God ever accepted was His own Son's; to have allowed Jephthah to sacrifice his daughter would have been to set her equal to Christ---an impossibility for obvious reasons. When teaching adult Sunday School, I pointed out the key to the entire event (and the solution to the problem), as it is translated in the KJV. There, Jephthah does not vow to kill anyone or anything; he vows to offer it. A vow to offer, on the part of the giver, does not bind the receiver to accept. Now, did she go to Shiloh to serve as a Temple handmaiden, with lifelong celibacy? Yes, and I think she was more than aware of that when she asked two months to mourn her virginity (notice that: she does not mourn her life, but her virginity). She mourns what was being sacrificed, what was being declared as acceptible by the receiver not the giver. Her father kept his vow totally---he vowed to offer, and he made the offer. But the offer of her sacrificial death was declined by the Law itself. (Who could imagine the priests at Shiloh allowing anyone to drag a screaming teenaged girl into the Holy of Holies and there slice her throat open with a shiny knife?) Although Jephthah was rash, God foresaw his rashness; and placed in his mouth the grammatical construction that allowed him to avoid profanation of the altar at Shiloh while retaining some degree of honor in fulfilling his vow. You have done a great job in this poem of demonstrating the difficult situation!
This is an excellent exegesis on a difficult problem that confounds many preachers who attempt to present a hayseed solution to it. Several years ago, I actually heard a preacher (whose preaching, since then, I avoid whenever I can) state that God, Whose Word is forever settled in Heaven, and Who has no respect of persons, made a momentary exception in the Law of Moses to allow Jephthah to actually kill his daughter to the glory of the Lord. The only human sacrifice God ever accepted was His own Son's; to have allowed Jephthah to sacrifice his daughter would have been to set her equal to Christ---an impossibility for obvious reasons. When teaching adult Sunday School, I pointed out the key to the entire event (and the solution to the problem), as it is translated in the KJV. There, Jephthah does not vow to kill anyone or anything; he vows to offer it. A vow to offer, on the part of the giver, does not bind the receiver to accept. Now, did she go to Shiloh to serve as a Temple handmaiden, with lifelong celibacy? Yes, and I think she was more than aware of that when she asked two months to mourn her virginity (notice that: she does not mourn her life, but her virginity). She mourns what was being sacrificed, what was being declared as acceptible by the receiver not the giver. Her father kept his vow totally---he vowed to offer, and he made the offer. But the offer of her sacrificial death was declined by the Law itself. (Who could imagine the priests at Shiloh allowing anyone to drag a screaming teenaged girl into the Holy of Holies and there slice her throat open with a shiny knife?) Although Jephthah was rash, God foresaw his rashness; and placed in his mouth the grammatical construction that allowed him to avoid profanation of the altar at Shiloh while retaining some degree of honor in fulfilling his vow. You have done a great job in this poem of demonstrating the difficult situation!
Starward