After thirteen decades, I brought to bear
my trite opinion on the controversy.
As I did not possess much depth of soul,
I followed what was then fashionable.
I thought three volumes helped me understand
what happened between you and Madame Sand.
Some of your comments must have been unfair.
I thought, then, I would write much poetry
about it; but no verse, no history
to speak of yet. Even political
agenda swayed my adolescent heart.
I should have been stayed by firm courtesy
from speaking of that of which not one part
was witnessed or experienced by me.
I should have listented to the prompts of Mercy:
Refrain from this. You were not even there.
Starward
[jlc]
I Liked The Hedging
apology in this write. The undeniable denial - that only wants the reader to explore what the controversy was. Great PR. ~Lady A~
Thank you. Forty years after
Thank you. Forty years after the controversy it is hard for me to believe that some of us undergrads, in the pretense of scholarly inquiry, turned this issue into a controversy that could even disturb friendships. The literature majors favored Sand; the music majors favored Chopin; and none of us, at the time, favored common sense. Now, I happen to have more respectful opinions toward Chopin. And I truly believe that the Second movements of his Second Piano Concerto is the most sublime secular music ever written, especially that section of the conclusion in which the basoon and the piano have a duet.
Seryddwr