Elizabeth Tudor With A Portrait Of Richard III

Plantagenet, you were validly royal.

My grandfather was small nobility,

a man whose ego was an unlanced boil.

The War of Roses, that catastrophe,

he used well as the hero of its peace.

Someone killed you in base ignominy.

My grandfather proudly put forth the claim

that he had done so, and deserved this crown

that I now wear.  His script men drug your name

through accusations of the foulest shame.

He married my grandmother (and your niece)

not for love, but, rather, to help ensure

his shaky occupation of the throne---

where, many thought, he ought not to be seated

("an upstart like him," was often repeated).

As for your murdered nephews, all the blame

has been heaped on you.  My grandfather feared

(as you need not have) their threat to his power---

had they emerged from those rooms in the Tower.

But, quite conveniently, they disappeared.

I have a problem, very much the same:

it threatens my reign and must be put down---

Mary of Scotland, much too popular

in parts of my realm.  She is a millstone

about my neck.  A swift severance of hers

is needed, and my whole council concurs.

She lives in house arrest (such a long stay)

where you were born:  Castle Fotheringhay.

But, Richard, will I face a retribution

on earth; or my soul damned for such pollution?

 

Starward

 

[jlc]

 

Author's Notes/Comments: 

My first, formal research paper, ever, was written at the end of sophomore year (spring, 1974) on Thomas B. Costain's book, The Last Plantagent.  I accepted Costain's conclusion that Richard had not murdered anyone, especially the princes his nephews.  I have read, later, that his great love for Anne Warwick, whom death took from him far too early, was such that he would not have considered another marriage, especially with the Yorkist heiress, Elizabeth, his niece.  Henry Tudor, however, a petty nobleman with bastardy in his line (and an ambitious mother who gave him birth at the tender age of thirteen), would have found the princes a desperate threat, while marriage to Elizabeth would have been highly useful.  Furthermore, even some of Henry's own legal advisors believed, against his wishes, that killing Richard on the battlefield did not, of itself, lead to possession of the throne.  If, however, the princes were not killed in the Tower by Richard, than the slaying of Richard at the battle of Bosworth Field was, in fact, murder, and a bar to ascending the throne.  As T. S. Eliot once pointed out, Richard was the last truly English king.  His successors, to the present day, have been of familes that emerged from Wales, Scotland, and Germany respectively.  Is this History's subtle criticism of what really happened on Bosworth field, and its legal impact?

View seryddwr's Full Portfolio