Last night the moon splashed
through a kingdom
and washed up here,
drowning
without touching
the lake,
drenched in the most
terrible splendor,
falling
into the excruciating
beauty of nothing
till the snarling darkness
found its way
to morning, and
I knew what hope was.
And then there was the
raucous stillness
hiding in the
first breeze,
a touch that played like
lute strings on
ten thousand willing
branches and
swarmed
like a young heart, and
I knew what peace was.
And there was sun-torn fog
shredding the grief
I wore like
a halo because the
mist was holier
than sorrow, and
I knew what joy might be.
If we are one
with the One
Who created worlds
we can say:
Here, take this hurt,
here,
turn it into light or petals
or rain or
whatever changes
everything . . .
Nothing will be the same—
no more skulking like
snakes under stones,
no more giving
our power away like
blood to sharks.
Last night a universe splashed
through a kingdom
and washed up here,
leaving new creations
in its wake and
I knew what we are:
We are that, and
so much more.
Patricia Joan Jones
Another page in the book I
Another page in the book I never tire of reading. Sculpting and painting words as fine pieces of art, capturing their beauty, and then unleashing your vision to be shared by the soul. It is always my pleasure to visit here. Thank you for these inspiring invitations.
Thank you so much for your
Thank you so much for your superb and very encouraging expression. I truly value your opinion, brilliant Poet!
Logged on to find Not 1 but 3
Logged on to find Not 1 but 3 poems to delight in! Thos is the first of the three and what a magnificent rhapsody! The sensitivity of the descriptions and the amazing use of a cutting line "I knew what peace was...I knew what joy might be..." wow! Just so wow! "The mist was holier than sorrow..." that was sincerely the most beautiful line I've read in the last 3 years! From a moon splash to a universe splash sometimes the journey must needs before we can truly understand the nature of existence and ourselves. If only everyone's journey to self discovery was as graceful and elegant as of was hortifyingly beautiful then wed probably ascend a whole lot more especially if we allknew what we really areand then so much more! Gorgeous write! Some astoundingly excellent lines. Much enjoyed. Hugss
Don't let any one shake your dream stars from your eyes, lest your soul Come away with them! -SS
"Well, it's love, but not as we know it."
Words pale in the presence of
Words pale in the presence of such eloquent footprints. I think I'll be living off this very kind comment for a week. Or more.
Huge love!
My reading of this poem
My reading of this poem happened twice: first, exposing myself to its verbal beauty, and the profound meaning of its content, knocked me off my feet (so to speak), so I had to recover myself sufficiently to be able to comment a little more objectively. Also, I am going to be using---quoting---some terms to the poem, and because I do not like the disruption of quotation marks in a comment, I will not offset them in that way. Having read the poem you know which words they are that I am using.
My first impression of this poem, an impression directed by the title itself, is that it is like what the musicologists call a tone poem---The Moldau by Smetana comes to mind---in which one instrument begins the movement, and then is joined by other individual instruments and then groups, in layers of sound. Her instruments are the verbs she summons into the poem: splashing, washing up, drowning, drenching, falling, snarling, finding a way . . . she martials these altogether in an orchestration or, to offer another metaphor, of a choreography of dancing; her words performing as effectively and efficiently as the finest ballet.
Now let me add the metaphor of a stellar system of many objects---planets, satellites, asteroids, and even a comet or two perhaps: and all of these orbit a stellar center of gravity---which is when the speaker understands what joy might be, and that joy is being at one with the Maker of the Cosmos. And because the Cosmos Maker is also declared (most authoritatively by the Apostle John) to be the Word of God, we have been given the ability to make things of words---not on the scale of a cosmos teeming with worlds, but in response to the existence of these creations. As I have said elsewhere, I believe that the one of the supreme vocations given to humanity, and primarily to humanity's poets, is to explain the Cosmos to itself. In the great creation Poem with which Genesis begins, humanity is invited to name the animals: naming is a use of words, and words are what we are summoned to, and---two thousand years ago---God's Word incarnated in Flesh in order to dwell among us as one of us, although without the inherent flaws of which we had become so fond and with which we had already wrecked our corner of the Cosmos. But we have been shown how are words, as this Poem declares to us, can convert hurt---injury---ache (especially soul-ache, I think)---into petals, rain, or whatever changes everything back to its original glory. We need no longer skulk beneath stones with the serpents (not for nothing was the Adversary depicted as a snake), nor need we feed the sharks the best parts of ourselves. And, to draw from a contemporary event, we need not descend into such dark and pressurized depths to see a pile of wreckage and debris, only to have ourselves implode from the pressure to join that wreckage and debris.
The poem proclaims that a universe has splashed through a kingdom and washed up here, bringing new creations. This is a metaphor for an increasing appreciation of the Cosmos to which the greatest of Poetry must, by its very nature, direct us, and in which it trains and schools us. And having revealed to us these processes, with all those strong verbs playing their part in this orchestral score that she has written in conversational words, the Poet discloses the Poem's supreme acquisition of knowledge in the final three lines.
Wow! Take a pause to catch the breath after this vigrous, but superlatively beautiful example of how much power of transcendent meaning our ordinary language can convey when used by a Poet with the highest degree of verbal and artistic quality. This is Poetry operating within the tradition of Vergil and Dante; and I would venture to suggest that this poem exceeds even the best of the late and final work of Wallace Stevens. And I am amazed that I, myself---having read so much of those Poets and their commentators, and wondering (with the immaturity of a listless undergrad) "what's it all for?"---now understand that, for me, it was all a preparation for the privilege of reading Patricia's poes and watching the assembling of this vast reflection of, and upon, the Cosmos that exists in her words. In his seminal and ground-breaking essay, "Tradition And The Individual Talent," T. S. Eliot wrote that each Poem not only joins the poems that have preceded it, but also alters the entire perspective (I think of this as being like the starlit skies---that are altered by each successive season as we swing around the sun). So, say, in Shakespeare, Richard III, Romeo and Juliet, and The Tempest create a perspective, along with all the other plays, that would not be possible were a single one of them absent or left unwritten. The view of the solar system from earth must, necessarily, be different than from, say, Jupiter or Pluto (despite its demotion). The same solar system; but with such a variety of difference available from all the possible perspectives: and this is how Patricia's Poems function, individually and as a group, to become her Poetry. Is this poem a centerpiece? Absolutely. But, depending on the perspective that you choose to view, all of her Poems are centerpieces.
At one of the deepest levels of the ocean, there is a pile of wrought steel that, apparently, is still attracting people to their deaths. That is a metaphor of humanity that, in my opinion, is innately chilling. Patricia's Poetry---like Vergil's and Dante's---reminds us, and directs us to realize, that the wreckage and debris in that oceanic trench need not be the sum total of our achievement. We are meant to look up, not down; that is why there are stars in our skies, and joints in our necks that move our gaze to those stars.
Starward
How on Earth do I thank you
How on Earth do I thank you for such an outstanding vote of confidence, written with expansive comprehension and your own stratospheric brand of poetics?
I was particularly moved by your conclusion and the choice we have to languish like wreckage on the ocean floor . . . or look up, homeward. And I believe you may have outdone me with your paraphrasing: "nor need we feed the sharks the best parts of ourselves". I almost wish I had said it that way! I also never fail to be awed by your definition of our supreme vocation: "to explain the Cosmos to itself".
After enjoying all your insights, splendor and perception, "Thank you" doesn't seem to cut it, but it's all I have, so in humble gratitude for this valuable gift, especially for the way you grasped the broader intent of my expression: Thank you!
Thank you so much for the
Thank you so much for the reply, I really appreciate your kind words. But I would also like to add an addendum to my original comment.
First . . . and I will never tire of saying this, Poetry is one of the most essential human functions, and your Poems have proven you as one of the most essential Poets. Wallace Stevens wrote a late poem called "The Planet on the Table" in which he described his Poetry under the metaphor of a globe that can be seen in any elementary school classroom. But you have gone beyond him---your Poetry is "The Universe on the Table," or, in this cyber age, "On the Screen," but wherever it is, table or screen, the main thing is that it is a universe. Your poems have a vertical dimension that Stevens reached only rarely; you reach it like it is right outside your front door, and you just step out to take a look around. Consider, for example, the lines that follow "I knew what joy might be." At that point, the poem blossoms into one of the most spiritually comforting perspectives that I have ever read in a poem in the fifty years that I have been reading Poetry. So many people start with or from this Earth, and then look toward the Cosmos (like the Webb and the Hubble out there in orbit), and ask "What's out there?"; but you, with your very adroit grasp of grandeur, look from the Cosmos back toward the earth and tell us, not asking but telling, "This is what's out there," and then you provide us a verbal depiction that is as exquisite, and as stunning, and as breathtaking, as any photograph that the Webb is capable of sending back to us. The Webb can see such perspectives because of a clever arrangement of mirrors, power sources, and programming code. You can see even further, and even greater, perspectives because of the receptive power of your Soul, and the largesse, also in your Soul, to share it in your Poems. When Stevens wrote that "Poets help people live their lives" he was describing what he hoped he would be, but he also was predicting what you do and do very well. I did not ever think of the vocation of human beings explaining the Cosmos to itself until your Poems began to demonstrate that very function.
Starward
I could say the same about
I could say the same about you: you see far and with a benevolent eye. Truly, I'm unspeakably grateful for your insights into my work, your valuable presence in this community and your support that has made all the difference. Your pen is a beacon!