World War Three

Folder: 
Song Lyrics

Verse 1
Welcome to 
The beginning of
What could very
Well be
World War Three
Congrats Russia
The whole world
Knew it would have been
Because of you
Didn't we
Invading Ukraine
Where you have
No right to be
Ignoring the wishes
Of your very own people
Congrats on being
Your very own
Class of evil

Chorus
War rings out
While even the people
Of the country
Who is attacking
Are screaming
Just stop
Please not this
Welcome to the start
Of World War Three

Verse 2
In the midst 
Of a pandemic
You actually thought
Hey lets start a war
And show an innocent country
What for
I'm Putin and I'm bored
Also POWER
More POWER
Because if I

Can't have that
Then what am I here for
And for good measure
Lets scare those countries
That might fight
Against me
While when it 
Comes to protests
I will arrest all at those too
Even in my own country
Maybe now they will
Respect me
Welcome to how
We got here

Chorus

View littlelennongurl's Full Portfolio
LawrenceMathebula's picture

No, world war three because of USA not Russia.

When i see Bush, i see a man who destroyed Iraq, when i see Obama, i see a man who destroyed Libya. Today, USA is indirectly fighting Russia through Ukraine; they could not do it directly, they had to form Nato to do it. Will USA step foot on Russian soil as if Libya or Iraq? No. They are not brave. Ok, maybe they will but thats where WW3 will start*. Russia is not evil, it's defending itself from foreign intervention, imperialism etc. If Ukraine was not close to Russia, it would've allowed them to do "as they wish".

S74rw4rd's picture

I disagree with the statement

I disagree with the statement that Russia is not evil.  To the best of my knowledge, Russia in still evil (metaphysically and theologically) because it has never (to the best of my knowledge) officially and nationally expressed remorse for the mass murders and martyrdoms it caused to both the hierarchy and the ordinary believers iof the Orthodox Church and its Faith,  and to the family (both immediate and extended) of the Czar.  To my mind, Lenin was demonically driven to exact from the Romnovs his vengeance for the judicial execution of his older brother:  I believe that his embrace of Marxism, from its beginning, was a practical connivance with which he could enlist the Party, and those who most benefitted (politically and economically) from the Revolution, to assist him in his unspoken desire to exact revence from the Romanov.  I do not suggest that the Czar should be entirely exonerated from his own political incompetence:  but what wrong had adolescent Alexei committed upon the Russian people that he, as well as his sisters (and even his dog) should be murdered by Bolshevik thugs?  And then the damage done to the properties and facilities of the Orthodox Church:  turning Cathedrals into public lavatories; seizing their bells and melting them down for the metal to be used for statues of Lenin placed on major streeet corners and sites of government administration; and the directed and deliberately blasphemous destruction wreaked, even, upon icons and communion vessels.  Whether we like to admit or not, no matter how much Marx, Engels, Lenin and Bolshevik philosophers express denial, there is a metaphysical (and, for Christians, a theological and eschatological) dimension to human existence---life---that Lenin and his cronies and thugs violated.  Even your own comment admits this, implicitly, by your assertion that "Russoa is not evil."  As long as no national remorse has been expressed, no penance performed; as long as that mummified stiff is on display in Red Square in that hideous structure known as "Lenin's Tomb"; as long as Russia, as a political entity, as raised up Orthodox chapels at the sites of the Romanox murders or body-disposal trenches . . . Russia's every action will be tainted with some degree of evil, tacitly present if not deliberately chosen and maintained.


Starward

LawrenceMathebula's picture

Did USA express any remorse for the damage in Libya...

Did USA express any remorse for the damage in Iraq after their soldiers killed millions of Iraquis just for one man( Saddam Hussein)? Also they(USA Bush& Tony Blair) accused Saddam of having mass destruction weaponry in Iraq, which he did not have. In Libya, they provided an arsenal to rebels for killing Gadafi and still even today Libya is struggling because of USA - the same in Iraq. Is that not evil? Even worse. There's others to mention but i stop here. USA is worse. We know. But should they cross the line and anger Putin, nuclear weapons will be used. We know.

S74rw4rd's picture

With the utmost respect to

With the utmost respect to you, I am sorry for what is, apparently, a lack of clarity on my part.  I was speaking only of Russia, of Russians (who happened to be Bolsheviks) turning on their own people, their own flesh and blood, and those with whom they had formerly worshipped according to the customs of the Orthodox Church.  I was not speaking comparitively of any other nation except Russia.  I apologize.  Out of respect, also, for LittleLennonGurl, to whose poem this comment section belongs, I will withdraw at this point; however, if you wish to discuss further, you can send me a PM.  Or not. 


Starward

LawrenceMathebula's picture

It's fine ...

No, it's fine. I was just saying what i know and when WW3 might start.
Respect to you and LennonGurl.

allets's picture

Let Us Pray

. . . WWIII does not end us. "Welcome to how we got here" is a great line! I believe his generals wiuld shoot him if he gave the irders to launch nukes. Generals and despots have ages old power division disputes. A military coup d'etat in Russia may save us from nuclear holocaust. We watch.

.

~Lady A~