THE ORIFICES OF LOVE WOULD TELL US THAT THIS IS SO.
His senses as though split in two; while his gaze as though
As a mad dog ran ahead of his yearning to placate his lust;
Could he, plunge his tongue into the moistest of tender places.
Now, he in his most assiduous of rational mind; could he justify
His tongue in her most personal of orifices; or, would he in his
Blind lust forgets that she is but a lady in need of ultimate gentleness.
Yes, Heny Miller, that rogue of the most deepest of sensuality, apologized
That his novels were banned in over fifty countries. Is that why we
All want to read Tropic of Cancer or are we being disingenuous.
Raw fucking in the most descriptive portrayals does not approach
The art that Henry Miller was trying to describe. It is not mere pelvic
Thrust or penile penetration that creates such literature. Look at the context.
In what context do we consider art and the most banal of functions twain;
Can it be that cunnilingus or fellatio is merely a profligate act or is there
Something we can say about all of humanity in this conjugal intimacy.
A man and his member is considered as but a violator and a woman with
Her flower all displayed as but a victim. Such is not the case; for if it were
True then Apollo and Aphrodite were not cut from the same stone of granite.
Lust if captured in stone would look like a frozen rape. Raw fucking is but
the orgiastic aspect of sex. When would we ever know that love and sex has
Any kind of juxtaposition? Their orifices of love would tell us that this is so.
"Sex is just the beginning, not the end. But if you miss the beginning, you will miss the end also."
-OSHO
-*-*-*
Insightful poems,As always yours.
keep on...