some would say
the paint itself is everything
but I say
not so
the idea 'ere first thought
is the prime ingredient in the crucial mix
yet note:
true beauty could never be adequately scaled
for all eyes do indeed vary
after all, so very different is he who is the
hatcher
he who conceives the numerous possibilities of
the end result
the artist's colorful, rectangular child
the true offspring of the initial inspiration
one might explain
every eye contains aspects of an artist
beauty can be quite universal
far beyond the realm of mere paints some canvas
and the brush
more than one opinion can appreciate its confines
the frame tends to embrace its physical beauty
alone
but it is the naked eye that makes up the work's
internal aura
what is aesthetically pleasing to the eye
may be only just that
ah, but what is truly a beautiful work of art
speaks articulately to the humble yet awed viewer
drawing such viewer quietly into his or her own
respected point of just what is pleasing to the eye
and each says so aloud
speaking unbiasedly (we hope) for the actual silence
of the painting itself
why God, himself created this very effect on man I
believe
for is it not indeed repeatedly perceived to be like
that amongst the souls in heaven
to speak to one another without the use of the
spoken word
so perhaps then, fine paintings are indeed Angels
themselves
well
at least tiny glimpses of them
anyway.....................
(Aug. 3, 1994 pm)