Author Information
Reasoning
It is logic that I hate that by the very logic which hates the logic that I hate one could apply logic to hate. The irrational is the real rational because no one individual or civilization can determine what is rational on the basis of rationality. First it was dark, it rained and the clouds remained black upon the river and then through the air the sun returned to brighten all. A man comprised of beads of water was shaken loose by the wind while observing the river in the moments that the rational became irrational and the weather changed. The man is alive however the beads of water are gone.
In logical settings of irrational belief the nuns without faces helped the children with their faces. The rationality of faceless people is irrational by the basis that faces must exist regardless of missing features however the children could not see eyes upon the faces which rendered their help irrational. But logic, that which I hate, would declare the sound of the children's voices as way in which the nuns could therefore help clean their faces as each was dirty from play.
The logic of love and lovers intwined is irrational. Because love is a feeling that can be applied to a missing person even presuming the person exists in the first place. Penguins don't wear masks but humans can. Start with the ground up and love the unknown that becomes flesh that represents and then dies. So that the unknown replaces the previous because this is what you were familiar with before the flesh appeared. Is that logical? Does the night know my algorithms and it is acting upon my actions?
Do we really die? That is to suggest that one must live to die but what is death other than the heart stopping? When the brain dies and the heart still moves is that not death through living? Is it rational to think that you could live without knowing it? Some could live on forever connected to machines but eventually the heart would stop. The logic of rational thought suggests that cloning is rational and a form of immortality because the cells required to duplicate the individual form another but without memory. So is this logic proof of living eternally regardless of the brain?
It is not rational that an assumption can become the assertion that the assumption is invalid of the assertion because of the assumption. So anyone who assumes must assert or else the assumption is invalid.
