Wayne Ferron

HOMELESS VAGABOND

MALICIOUSLY PROSECUTED

LEGALLY BULLIED

Constituency Office of Madeleine Meilleur

237 Montreal Rd.

Ottawa

K1L 6C7

Email: mmeilleur.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org

Phone: 613-744-4484

Fax: 613-744-0889

 

Ministry of the Attorney General

McMurtry-Scott Building 720 Bay Street, 11th Floor

Toronto

M7A 2S9

Email: attorneygeneral@ontario.ca

Phone: 416-326-2220

Fax: 416-326-4007

Tollfree Phone: 1-800-518-7901

Dear Honourable Madeleine Meillerur

With an open and righteous mind I disclose some problems rotting away and festering within your Ministry.

TAKE NOTICE:  THE ESSENCE OF THE MATTER BEFORE USE IS FAIRNESS, EQUITY, LEGAL BULLYING, HUMAN RIGHTS, LEGAL RIGHTS AND ACCESS TO JUSTICE.

 

The State has breached its confidence in its relationship of trust with my person, a member of the collective byway of the tortious actions of its relevant institutions, relevant policies the said institutions, unspoken political agendas, agents and subcontractors.

 

This has not only damaged me and my children's life, liberty, security and pursuit of happiness; but also the delicate fabric of our beloved democratic society. This actionable wrong destroys the bonds of trust which is an essential element in the building of a successful society.

 

Moreover, these tortious actions unravels the threads of trust which binds and holds the collective together and ensure its overall well being and social health. Herein is the sinful actionable wrong against my person and the Canadian community.

 

With all of this collateral argument going on, let me remind the the honourable Madeleine Meilleur, that the essence of why we are all here in this country and this province of Ontario; and in so doing, recall the society we are suppose to be living in.

 

·   The Parliament of Canada, affirming that the Canadian Nation is founded upon principles that acknowledge the supremacy of God, the dignity and worth of the human person and the position of the family in a society of free men and free institutions;

·       

·      Affirming also that men and institutions remain free only when freedom is founded upon respect for moral and spiritual values and the rule of law;

·       

·      And being desirous of enshrining these principles and the human rights and fundamental freedoms derived from them, in a Bill of Rights which shall reflect the respect of Parliament for its constitutional authority and which shall ensure the protection of these rights and freedoms in Canada:

 

 

The Province of Quebec Preamble R.S.Q., chapter C-12 Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms asserts;

 

“WHEREAS every human being possesses intrinsic rights and freedoms designed to ensure his protection and development;

 

Whereas all human beings are equal in worth and dignity, and are entitled to equal protection of the law;

 

Whereas respect for the dignity of human beings, equality of women and men, and recognition of their rights and freedoms constitute the foundation of justice, liberty and peace;

 

Whereas the rights and freedoms of the human person are inseparable from the rights and freedoms of others and from the common well-being;

 

Whereas it is expedient to solemnly declare the fundamental human rights and freedoms in a Charter, so that they may be guaranteed by the collective will and better protected against any violation;”

(R.S.Q., chapter C-12 Charter of human rights and freedoms, Preamble.)

 

Para 1 and 2 establishes and affirms the right and freedom of a human being in a general way. Para 3 is saying that without a common respect for human dignity, it is not possible for society as we know it, are for our collective to exist in its present form.

 

Para 4 concede that there is a link between the Rights and Freedom of the person and the effective functionality of the collective. There is a relationship between the health and well being of the collective and the Rights and Freedom of the individual.

 

Rights and Freedom are generally thought of as being a means of protection and a check and balance against the insurmountable power of the collective. But, here its saying that if you harm the individual you are harming the collective and this intern has a dramatic affect on the health and well being of the totality of our society.

 

This is why I am in love with the Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms, Preamble. It make the extra step, and it is beautiful for this reason.

 

THIS IS WHAT I for one BELIEVE IN, THIS IS THE SOCIETY I HOPE FOR, THIS IS THE HUMANITY I VOTE FOR and THIS IS THE WAY OF LIFE I CHOOSE TO FIGHT FOR!!!!

YOURS TRULY

Wayne Ferron

I have notified the HRTO of the following;

“URGENT EMERGENCY TO OBTAIN MEDICATION

I came to Toronto to attend an Hospital to obtain necessary medication for health according to doctors best medical practice, only to discover that I don't qualify for a drug card from social services without the proper identification.

Recall that Officer Pekeski(2261) has stolen my Identification and fail to return it after I exercised my colour of right on more than one occasions.

 

The courts has refused to enforce the RULE OF LAW, at the minimum-directing Officer Pekeski(2261) to returned my belongings and have signed off on receiving all out standing  pending personal belongings.

 

BUT i AM NOT A HUMAN BEING, deserving of equal services even if it means damaging my health or possible killing(social murder) me by withholding services from a Afro Canadian.

 

I require at the minimum an interim order for a drug card or the IMMEDIATE return of my identification from PEEL REGIONAL POLICE SERVICES.

please EMAIL ME TO PICK WITH THE ORDER OR HAVE ME PICK IT UP AT YOUR OFFICE. i AM IN TORONTO, STAY AT OUT OF THE COLD SHELTERS! I CAME FOR NECESSARY REQUIRED MEDICAL SERVICES

 

                                     

FACT-PURMUTATION:

1. Justice Andrea’ COURT ORDER banning me(Wayne Ferron) from all courts in ONTARIO and taking my legal rights and the ability to defend my civil and political rights. If I cannot defend my rights, then I have no rights including human rights!

2. HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL endorsement or order to suspend HRTO 2012-12585-I(2013 HRTO 1544).No resolution or restitution for this matter has damaged my life and my children life, in addition to crippling me in moving closure to normal living.

3. EMPLOYMENT INSURANCE Nov 26, 2014 decision to denied me  employment insurance benefits for the false PREMISE OF “left your employment without just cause”. I have call EI(1800 206 7218) to offer more information, answer any question, but they always replied in the negative. I have called E. Hoffman (1 866 950 7227) at least four time to no avail at EI commission.

4. I was sent to SOCIAL SERVICES BY EMPLOYMENT INSURANCE for help, when there was no help pursuant to there policy.

5. ONTARIO-WORKS policy which denies social benefits on the bases of not having proper identification. I WAS DENIED A DRUG CARD in accordance with policy.

6.    John Gerretsen (Attorney General [20 Oct 2011 – 25 March 2014]), choosing no to enforce the CRIMINAL of CANADAN , with respect to Officer Pekeski (2261) theft of my personal proper(HEALTH CARD etc.) is the cause of action for this matter.

 

The aforesaid permutation create the perfect conditions for the denial of SOCIAL SERVICES and creating an impediment to my health and well being.

Furthermore, this may cause my death or fatal injury. I leave my life (weather I live or die in the hands of HRCTO and EMPLOYMENT INSURANCE (E. Hoffman – 1 866 – 950 -722 ext 5684)

 

 

HEALTH RISK:

1. On January 9, 2015 at St. Michael’s Emergency, my first  blood pressure reading was 203/118.

2. On January 9, 2015 at St. Michael’s Emergency, my second  blood pressure reading was 196/183.

3. On January 8, 2015, I was experiencing headaches in the back of my head, in addition to headaches at the side of my head.

4. A few days before January 9, 2015, I was experiencing headaches.

5. I have provided a copy of the prescription I cannot afford, but desperately need

6. 
   

 

 

REASON FOR APPEAL:

1. Employment Insurance decision puts my life at risk and help to block me from accessing social services freely.

2. EMPLOYMENT INSURANCE, premise that I left my employment for no just case is a false premise, for my premise given on page 2 and 3 in the MOTION RECORD. Unless, unlawfully using HWY 10 dangerously and unsafely which may result in my death in a reasonable thing to do in accordance with EMPLOYMENT INSURANCE DECISION.

3. I HAVE -$100.00 IN THE BANK, I SLEEP IN out of the cold shelters (HOMELESS SHELTERS) in my futile effort to access medical care and social services to take care of my health and secure employment..”

I have notified the former Attorney General of the following;

 

 

“ATTENTION TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL,

MR. JOHN GERRETSEN:

 

“Do you know the way we all feel when we are in a relation of trust, and confidence(spouse, lover,  mate, etc.); when our partner in a fiduciary relationship violate the trust which binds the members of the same trust relationship( ex. Taking another lover).

 

Are your familiar with the deep heart wrenching feeling of how your intestines, and organs feel like they have been tied up in a knock, and being squeeze in the palm of a hand.

 

This is how I feel when I realized my beloved Government's inability to protect my family from the improper effort of it's agents to profile me as a crack addict, as violent, as a drunkard, as mentally diseased, and as a Criminal WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW, WITHOUT A FAIR HEARING,  WITHOUT CONVINCING EVIDENCE BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT, WITHOUT THE OPPORTUNITY TO ARGUE MY CASE AND GIVE EVIDENCE TO THE CONTRARY BEFORE AN IMPARTIAL TRIBUNAL BEFORE MY FREEDOM RIGHTS ARE TAKEN AWAY OR STOLEN. Malicious prosecution based on criminal actions will never be accepted in civilized democratic systems of governance.

 

You have no idea of the up-evil the above has caused in my life. But what pains most is the damage to my beloved four baby girls (my lovely ladies); their full potential stolen, their opportunity burgled, and their innocent expectation snuffed out before the maximum illumination of their magnificence could be reached.

 

As an example, my first born beloved child needed to have her braces removed or fixed; because it was in-bedding itself in her gums. The “civil death” affected upon my person totally destroyed my ability to obtain funds byway of work to take care of my responsibility(take care of my babies). It took me awhile to find a kind enough dentist to remove the said braces. Dentist as a rule are aversive to touching another dentist work.   

I regretfully inform you that I am unable to serve you the motion record for the constitutional application. I do not have the money to produce extra copies; in any event, the presiding Justice has stated on more than one occasion that you will not be participating in the matter before us on more than one occasion. “HOW IS IT POSSIBLE THAT THE SAME HONOURABLE JUDGE WAS INFORMED OF YOUR INTENSION IN REGARDS TO YOUR PARTICIPATION IN CR-12-70000061, BUT I WAS NOT FORMALLY INFORMED OF YOUR INTENSIONS. HOW?

 

You cannot use my poverty as a legal weapon to defeat my claim, or bring to pass your desired outcome. The beloved Canadian people would like to hear the answers to my questions in the proper platform or in a court of competent jurisdiction. Please adjourned the matter and give me enough time to serve you your documents in accordance with PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS, if you desire time, and seek to know truth.

 

 

 

...Furthermore, it is an indication of the depth of humanity, intelligence, and quality of ones civilization and civilize practice of law when ones have the common human decency or ethics to properly respond to the deep convictions of ones beloved subjects or a fellow member of the Canadian collective, whom are concern about the state of our society and its continual  evolution to the betterment of all in the collective.  The social fabric should not be purposefully burned by those who act for we the people.

 

The so called label of entity, does-not excuse the same entity from possessing integrity, human decency, or having concerns, and care for the well being of members of society, and society at large; on a large enough scale to invoke an intelligent response to proceed to restitution, resolution, or adversarial contentious argument of humane parties at trial, for the determination of a plea of a just cause. We all know that none response is looked upon as an admission of guilt by the law of this land and by the courts of civilize nations.

 

Moreover, the State's Public Institutions and their corresponding policies in addition to Tribunals, all respond to none response as a silent statement or admission of guilt. It is a guilty mind(men rea)! Section 15 of our beloved Charter insures equity in law and fairness in the application of law.

 

 

“ ...the conqueror’s law

was a means of imposing obedience...”

“...Justinian the Legislator

was also Justinian the Warrior,

and the arts of peace

were at one with the arts of war...”

”

 

 

“A person’s words carries their bonds

and the precious treasures of intentions

they display proudly around their neck.

 

The quality and integrity of a person depends on one fulfilling ones promises. Ones honour is encapsulated  by his words.

 

A person in high public office carries the reputation of the said office. The said public office builds and binds public confidence

in the integrity and equity of the implementation of the Criminal  Code."

 

By Wayne Ferron...ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

 

 

 

 

The state has repetitively refused to provide me with a lawyer to prove my innocence; however, the State has been vigorously defending vicariously Public Agents whom has committed fraud, assault, and perjury. The unmentioned individuals seem to be above the RULE OF LAW, and the State has no problem defending them vigorously. Since the Provincial and Federal Government has shielded the individuals in my private prosecution allegation; I respectfully request the HER-MAJESTY THE QUEEN in right of ONTARIO, and  HER-MAJESTY THE QUEEN in right of

              

CANADA, to please insure that it's employee do what is right, what is honourable, and show some integrity in the prompt return of all  the property stolen from my person. The following are my property which needs to be returned:

 

To Ms. Joanne Stuart or the MINISTRY OF JUSTICE  please return forthwith, my FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST Ms. Joanne Stuart stole and never return to my person. I am exercising my colour of right over the said legal instrument.

 

 

To the SALVATION ARMY

and

To the REGION OF PEEL or REGION OF PEEL HOMELESS SHELTER

 

please return forthwith my $5 0r $10 check made out to the Minister of Finance and my $10(11 466 978 57 ) money ORDER issued by CANADA POST to the SALVATION ARMY for the SALVATION ARMY and ONTARIO WORKS.

 

CANADA POST MONEY ORDER INFORMATION:

             SERIAL NO.:          11 466 978 57

             SECURITY CODE:   679 965 794

             OFFICE NO.:          102 205

 

 

 

 

 

 

To PEEL REGIONAL POLICE SERVICES

7750 Hurontario Street, Brampton,

ON, L6V 3W6

(905) 453-3311

 

 

RE:  I respectfully request byway of COLOUR OF RIGHT, the prompt return of all my belongings stolen or confiscated or whatever the case my be, by your subordinate  Officer Pekeski(2261) whom disclosed to my person the false identity of Officer Perkins(2261) in addition to the PEEL REGIONAL POLICE disclosing his identity as Officer Perkins(2261).

 

TAKE NOTICE: OFFICER #2261 Pekeski, M. (12B), having seized my personal belongings and exerting carriage and control over the same seized property to which I had colour of right, in addition to the same Officer continuing to effect his authority, care, guardianship or jurisdiction over my property, became in essence the BAILIFF  of my seized personal property, for example “the finder of mislaid property becomes a bailee thereof. Please, return forthwith my property which has been stolen!! For we are all equally subjected to the fair application and enforcement of the law. We AUGHT TO respect the RULE OF LAW.

 

 

 

 

To the ONTARIO COURT OF JUSTICE(CENTRAL EAST REGION)-REGISTRAR and Your Worship Justice Maklif, please return promptly the evidence(AFFIDAVIT OF WAYNE FERRON C51190) I disclosed to Your Worship Justice Malik for my filed information against Geoffery Farday; I have exercised my colour of right in requesting the same Affidavit evidence to no avail.

l

          

 

 

 

To the duty counsel(Rene Rupert) of  ONTARIO COURT OF JUSTICE(CENTRAL EAST REGION)Renee Rupert; thank you for the  return of my court material, which you promised to return to my person which I sent you via express mail to participate on my behalf in my matter(CR-126 et al); Even though it took you about one year to return my legal documents after asserting that DUTY COUNSELS are bared from assisting in SUPERIOR COURT matters.

 

 

“Contrary to popular belief I am a father who can be

no less than a beloved mother. I have four

beloved girl children.”

 

By Wayne Ferron...ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

 

 

 

I have notified the courts and both federal/provincial HUMAN RIGHTS commissions of the following;

MS. KRICK PREJUDICING PRIVATE PROSECUTIONS:

...On the 13th day of August 2013 Ms. Krick  for the Crown attempted on at least one occasion to defeat the proper course of justice with the fraudulently procured “VEXATIOUS LITTIGAN” court order; the aforementioned court order was released on July 8, 2013 by the honourable  Justice I. Andre J. after being mislead by Ms. Kathryn Kirkpatrick (BORDEN LADNER GERVAIS LLP) whom is counsel for CROWN AGENTS(YORK REGIONAL POLICE SERVICES ET AL). Kathryn E. Kirkpatrick (BLG File No.:016995.000102) mislead the SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE and a Judicial, in order to pervert the course of justice with the intent of perverting the course of justice.

{...}

 

[20] On the 13th of September 2013, the Honorable Justice Watt dismissed my Private Prosecution matter M42322 while I was requesting to speak to DUTY COUNSEL and never requested an adjournment.

 

[21] The Honorable Justice Watt never gave me leave and dismissed my Private Prosecution matter M42322 even though I filed all required material for an application, while the CROWN(Ms. Krick) filed no materials except for the RESPONDENT MOTION (M42322) containing a copy of the “VEXATIVE LITIGAN ORDER” the CROWN was attempting to use to defeat my PRIVATE PROSECUTIONS(CR – 12-01264 ET AL).

 

[22] On the 13th of December 2013, the Honorable Justice La Forme adjourned motion for direction C56817 (M42921) concerning many missing exhibits (C56817), outstanding TRANSCRIPTS (C56817), the Crown improperly removing C56817 from the COURT OF APPEAL RECORDS without lawful permission, to December 18, 2013.

 

[23] On the 18th of  December 2013, the Honorable Justice Jurianz excepted  my late filing of FACTUM C56817(M42921) concerning many missing exhibits(C56817), outstanding TRANSCRIPTS(C56817), and the  Crown(Ms. Krick) improperly removing C56817 from the COURT OF APPEAL RECORDS without lawful permission.

 

[24]   I was not given Proper service or disclosure of the honourable Justice I. Andre J. court order release on July 8th, 2013.

 

[26] Pursuant to the COURT OF APPEAL- REGISTRAR's copy of the honourable Justice I. Andre J. court order release on July 8th, 2013; the COURT OF APPEAL-REGISTRAR received their copy of the said “VEXATIVE ORDER” on October 15, 2013.

 

[27]   Furthermore the Honourable Justice I. Andre J. court order release on July 8th, 2013, directs for a copy of the same order to be sent to all SUPERIOR COURTS, ALL DIVISIONAL COURT, and the COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO; but oddly, Justice I. Andre J. did not direct for the same court order to be sent to Wayne Ferron, whom the same order is against or affects the most in removing all my legal rights in all courts in all of Ontario.

 

[28]   Justice I. Andre J. orders that a copy of the same order be forthwith delivered to the ONTARIO COURT OF APPEAL, and every region of the SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, and DIVISIONAL COURT; the Honourable Justice I. Andre J. “COURT ORDER” which came to the Applicant's attention on August 20, 2013 at about 6 a.m.. VIA  the Crown's(Ms. Krick) unsigned RESPONDENT'S MOTION RECORD(M42322),  on August 13, 2012.

 

[29]   The copy of the honourable Justice I. Andre J. typed court order which was located in the Crown's(Ms. Krick) unsigned RESPONDENT'S MOTION RECORD(M42322), was missing significant information, mainly;  Parties to Proceeding, Title of Proceeding, and name of originating COURT(AUTHORITY) for the same court order.

 

[30]   On January 15th, 2014 I requested from the COURT OF APPEAL REGISTRAR a certified copy of ,the honourable Justice I. Andre J. court order release on  July 8th; the Registrar refused to certified the same copied order in their file(M42812) which was not properly disclosed to my person.

 

[31]   On January 15th, 2014 I discovered that the honourable Justice I. Andre J. written court order release on July 8th, the honourable Justice I. Andre J. typed court order, and the honourable Justice I. Andre J. REASON FOR JUDGEMENT release on July 17th   were all placed in COURT OF APPEAL file (M42812) without lawful service to my person nor proof of service.

 

[32]   Furthermore, the honourable Justice I. Andre J. written court order release on July 8th, the honourable Justice I. Andre J. typed court order, and the honourable Justice I. Andre J. REASON FOR JUDGEMENT release on July 17th had been in the possession of the COURT OF APPEAL-REGISTRAR’S possession since October 15, 2013.

 

[33]   Pursuant to the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106;

Reasons

393. The Court may deliver reasons for judgment

(a) orally from the bench at the conclusion of the hearing of a proceeding; or

(b) after having reserved judgment at the conclusion of a hearing, by depositing in the Registry written reasons, signed by the judge or prothonotary who delivered them.

Drafting of order

394. (1) Where the Court gives reasons, it may direct one of the parties to prepare for endorsement a draft order to implement the Court's conclusion, approved as to form and content by the other parties or, where the parties cannot agree on the form and content of the order, to bring a motion for judgment in accordance with rule 369.

Pronouncement of judgment

(2) On the return of a motion under subsection (1), the Court shall settle the terms of and pronounce the judgment, which shall be endorsed in writing and signed by the presiding judge or prothonotary.

Copies to be sent

395. (1) Subject to subsection 36(3), the Administrator shall send without delay a copy of every order made and of any reasons given other than in open court to all parties

(a) by registered mail;

(b) by electronic means, including facsimile and electronic mail; or

(c) by any other means, as directed by the Chief Justice, likely to bring the order and any reasons to the attention of the party.

Proof of receipt

(2) If an order and any reasons are transmitted by electronic means, the Administrator shall confirm receipt by the party and place proof of that receipt on the Court file.

SOR/2010-177, s. 6.

 

[34]   The aforementioned requirements of the  Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 has not been fulfilled.

 

[35]   Pursuant to THE COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH ACT

(C.C.S.M. c. C280) ;

 

WHEN PROCEEDINGS MAY BE HEARD

In absence of opposite party

3.03(2)     No motion, reference, examination, assessment of costs or other matter, except a motion made without notice, shall proceed before a judge, master or other officer in the absence of the opposite party until 15 minutes after the time fixed for it.

 

 

[36]   Pursuant to Practice Direction Concerning Civil Appeals in the Court of Appeal (filed with the Secretary of the Civil Rules Committee on October 7, 2003);

5.3 Confirmation of Motion

1. A party who makes a motion on notice to another party shall :

(a) confer or attempt to confer with the other party;

(b) not later than 2 p.m. two days before the hearing date, give the Registrar a confirmation of motion (Form 37B, below, or as set out in the Rules of Civil Procedure) by sending it by fax, (416-327-5032), by e-mail (COA.E-file), or by leaving it at the court office; and

(c) send a copy of the confirmation of motion to the other party by fax or e-mail.2. If no confirmation is given, the motion shall not be heard, except by order of the court.3.A party who has given a confirmation of motion and later determines that the confirmation is no longer correct shall immediately give the Registrar a corrected confirmation of motion (Form 37B) and send a copy of the corrected confirmation of motion to the other party.

 

[37]   I Wayne Ferron, have requested of the COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO, a certified copy of the Honourable Justice I. Andre J. court order release on  July 8th, 2013 by formal written REQUESTION; there was no response to my written REQUESTION, and I have been refused a certified copy by the same REGISTRAR on  more than one occasions.

 

[38]   I Wayne Ferron, have requested of the SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE(CENTRAL WEST REGION), a certified copy of the Honourable Justice I. Andre J. court order release on  July 8th, 2013 by formal REQUESTION; there was no response to my written REQUESTION,

 

[39]   I Wayne Ferron, have requested of the SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE(CENTRAL WEST REGION), a certified copy of the proof of receipt for the Honourable Justice I. Andre J. court order release on  July 8th, 2013 by formal REQUESTION; there was no response to my written REQUESTION.

 

[40]   I Wayne Ferron, have requested of the SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (CENTRAL WEST REGION), a certified copy of the confirmation of motion (CV 13-1060) before the Honourable Justice I. Andre J. by formal REQUESTION; there was no response to my written REQUESTION.

 

[41]  Pursuant to RULE 59.02 of RULES OF CIVIL PRACTICE;

ENDORSEMENT BY JUDGE OR OFFICER

59.02  (1)  An endorsement of every order shall be made on the appeal book and compendium, record, notice of motion or notice of application by the court, judge or officer making it, unless the circumstances make it impractical to do so. R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 194, r. 59.02 (1); O. Reg. 19/03, s. 10.

(2)  Where written reasons are delivered,

(a) in an appellate court, an endorsement is not required;

(b) in any other court, the endorsement may consist of a reference to the reasons,

and a copy of the reasons shall be filed in the court file. R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 194, r. 59.02 (2).

 

[42]  Pursuant to  RULE 59.03 of the RULES OF CIVIL PRACTICE;

PREPARATION AND FORM OF ORDER

Preparation of Draft Formal Order

59.03  (1)  Any party affected by an order may prepare a draft of the formal order and send it to all other parties represented at the hearing for approval of its form. R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 194, r. 59.03 (1);

 

 

[43]   I Wayne Ferron, have requested of the Ms. Kirpatrick, a copy of the confirmation for the motion (CV 13-1060) before the Honourable Justice I. Andre J..

 

[44]   I Wayne Ferron, have requested of the Ms. Kirpatrick, a copy of the proof of evidence use to convince the Honourable Justice I. Andre J. that I have or may have had legal proceedings at any DIVISIONAL COURT in ONTARIO.

 

[45]   I Wayne Ferron, have requested of the Ms. Kirpatrick, to cross examine  AFFIDAVIT OF  BRADBURY  FERRON V. R.; court file No. 07-22259(S.C.J.) Ms. Kathryn E Kirkpatrick filed with the SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE(CENTRAL WEST REGION)-REGISTRA, and which she used as proof or evidence to persuade the Honourable Justice I. Andre J. that I am a VEXATIVE LITIGANT  by formal REQUESTION; Ms. Kirkpatrick failed to attend the March 5, 2014 Hearing even though she promised Justice Feldman on January 29, 2014 that she would be attending.

 

[46]  Ms. Kathryn E. Kirkpatrick who is counsel for YORK REGIONAL POLICE SERVICES et al failed to attend motion M42812 before the honourable Justice Felman on January 29th, 2014.

 

Similarly,  Ms. Kathryn E. Kirkpatrick who is counsel for YORK REGIONAL POLICE SERVICES et al failed to attend HEARING M42812  on March 5th, 2014 after promising  the honourable Justice Felman on January 29th, 2014 that she would do so, after being called by a CLEARK of the COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO over the speaker phone on January 29th, 2014, Ms. Kathryn E. Kirkpatrick was offered an adjournment despite her nonattendance on January 29th, 2014 while the honourable Justice Feldman was seized with the same legal matter(M42812).

 

[47]   The honourable Justice Horigan confirmed on March 5, 2014  the Honourable Justice I. Andre J. court order release on  July 8th, 2013 by asserting from the bench in open court that;

“Justice I. Andre J. was absolutely right”

Without the presentation of real evidence or the TRANSCRIPTS OF PROCEEDING (CV 13-1060), for which I was denied an adjournment to obtain for the purpose of assisting the court.

 

[48]    The honourable Justice Feldman confirmed on January 30, 2014 the Honourable Justice I. Andre J. court order release on July 8th, 2013 by asserting from the bench in open court that;

“...you are a vexation litigant! I am staying the matter...”

 

While matter M43059 was before her to be heard or she was seized  by the same matter, and the Crown had failed to file a RESPONDENT FACTUM(M43059) or any material to assist the court.

 

[49]   Matter M43059 is concerning a PRIVATE PROSECUTION appeal from the honourable JUSTICE WATT dismissed of M42322.

 

[50]  Furthermore,  the honourable Justice K. Feldman directs the following in her January 30, 2014 endorsement;

“Mr. Ferron is seeking an extension of time to appeal a decesion of Justice Healey of the New Market Superior Court. However, Mr. Ferron is not entitled to bring any proceedings without the authorization of the Regional Senior Justice because of the vexatious litigant order of Andre' J. of June 2013.

 

Mr. Ferron is seeking to appeal that order. Until the appeal is resolved, that order is in effect and must be adhere to. Therefore this matter is adjourned sine die to be brough back on only if and when the vexatious litigant order is set aside or with the authorization or the REGIONAL Senor Justice as per the order of Justice Andre'.”

 

[51]    Pursuant to the honourable Justice I. Andre J. court order release on July 8th, 2013 under the tittle APPENDIX “A”;

“[1] THIS COURT DECLARES that Wayne Ferron has persistently and without reasonable grounds instituted vexatious proceedings and conducted proceedings in a vexatious manner in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, the Divisional Court, and the Ontario Court of Appeal, within  the meaning of sections 140(1)(a ) and (b) of the Court Of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, C.  C.43”

 

 

[2] THE COURT PROHIBITS Wayne Ferron either directly or indirectly, from instituting any proceeding or continuing any proceedings previously instituted in any court in Ontario, except until such time as he obtain leave pursuant to section 140(3) of the Courts of Justice Act and as provided for in this order.

 

[3] THIS COURT DIRECTS that any such application for leave will be in writing and sent by fax or registered mail to  the Regional Senior Justice of Central West Region (the “RSJ”)  ex parte, which shall be accompanied by an affidavit that outlines the merits of the proposed proceeding or step, and a copy of this ORDER. The application and affidavit shall not exceed 10 pages in  length. The application and affidavit shall not exceed 10  pages in length. The  the application for leave will be determined by the RSJ or her designee, who will

(i) give direction as to the service of the application, which shall include service on the Attorney General, and the procedure for the determination of the application, or

(ii) dismiss the application.

 

 

[4] THIS COURT ORDERS that any service on the Attorney General that directed by RSJ or her designee referred to in paragraph 3 of this Order shall only be given by registered mail addressed and sent as follows:

 

         Attorney General of Ontario

         c/o Legal Director of the Crown Law Office-Civil

         8th Floor, 720 Bay Street

         Toronto, Ontario, M7A 2S9

 

[5] THIS COURT FURTHER ORDERS that should Wayne Ferron file materials seeking to commence or continue a proceeding or any appeal in any court in Ontario without first filing and an entered Order Permitting him to do so; the proceeding shall be immediately stayed upon any person filing a copy of this Order in such court.  

 

[6] THIS COURT FURTHER ORDERS that no further proceedings will be accepted from Wayne Ferron for filing or scheduling by any court in Ontario without the approval of the RSJ or her designate.

 

[7] THIS COURT FURTHER ORDERS that a copy of this Order be forthwith delivered to the Ontario Court of Appeal and every region of the Superior Court of Justice and Divisional Court.

 

[8] Cost in the amount of $3, 000 inclusive to go in favour of the applicant.”

 

[56] On the 13th of August 2013,  Assistant Crown Attorney Deborah Krick whom has carriage, and control of matter M42322, admitted  in open court to having possession of COURT OF APPEAL file C56817; she promised to return it to the  COURT OF APPEAL RECORDS, and has done so. She has had sufficient time to review file C56817 and cannot justify asserting any false statements she  aught to know is false in contravention of the PROFESSIONAL RULES OF CONDUCT.

 

[57] Pursuant to Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106;

Inspection of files

26. (1) Where the necessary facilities are available, any person may, with supervision and without interfering with the business of the Court, inspect a Court file or annex

 

Removal of documents from file

(2) Nothing shall be removed from a Court file or annex except

(a) under an order of the Court;

(b) by an officer of the Registry acting in the course of his or her duties; or

(c) in accordance with rule 26.1.

Removal of files

(3) Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, no Court file or annex to a Court file shall be removed from the Registry by any person other than

(a) a judge, prothonotary or referee; or

(b) an officer of the Registry acting in the course of his or her duties.

SOR/2002-417, s. 3.

Definition

26.1 (1) In this rule, “appeal” includes an appeal of an order of a prothonotary, an application for leave to appeal and an appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada.

Removal of exhibits from file

(2) Subject to subsection (4), exhibits put into evidence shall remain in the Court file either

(a) until the time for an appeal has expired, if no appeal has been taken, or

(b) until the appeal is disposed of, if an appeal has been taken.

Return of exhibits

(3) On the expiry of the time for appeal or on the disposition of the appeal, the Administrator shall return the exhibits to the respective solicitors or the parties who put the exhibits in evidence.

Return on consent

(4) At any time following judgment, on requisition by the solicitor or party who put an exhibit in evidence or the person who produced it and on the filing of the consent of all parties, the Administrator shall return the exhibit to the person making the requisition.

SOR/2002-417, s. 4.

 

[58]  Justice Watt's February 26th, 2014 directions(C55532) seems to be inconsistent with Justice Andre' “VEXATIVE ORDER”, Justice Feldman's January 30, 2014 Judgment(M43059), and the CRIMINAL CODE OF CANADA(Section 482(1), Section 127, Section 22.1).

 

[59] On February 26th, 2014 I informed court while before Justice Watt in open court that I have been determined to be a “VEXATIVE LITIGANT.”

 

[60] On or about February 25th, 2014, the COURT OF APPEAL-REGISTRAR made an unwritten judgment that the Applicant was a “VEXATIVE LITIGAN”, and there after stop receiving or filing court materials from the APPLICANT in a normal fashion. If court documents are accepted, they seem to be set aside in addition there seem to be no entering of motions or scheduling of motions for directions; yet the honourable Justice Watt expects me to engage in proceedings and perfect appeals.

 

[61] The honourable Justice Hourigan  on March 5, 2014 Judgment(M42812) seems to be  inconsistent with the application of Justice Andre' “VEXATIVE ORDER,” since the same order directs that there is no appeal against the order.

 

[62]  On March 5th , 2014 the COURT OF APPEAL-REGISTRAR made an unwritten judgment, and determined that I was a “VEXATIVE LITIGAN”, and returned my supporting court materials(NOTICE OF MOTION BEFORE A PANEL, FACTUM, MOTION RECORD) for a  motion before the panel returnable on February 25, 2014 in addition to failing to file MOTION FOR DIRECTION(C56817); pursuant to Justice Feldman January 30, 2014 ENDOURSEMENT and  Justice .I. Andre J. “COURT ORDER” determine me to be a “VEXATIVE LITIGAN”.

 

[63]    A copy of Justice Feldman Endorsement, and   Justice .I. Andre J. “COURT ORDER” was given to the Applicant with Para [2] and Para[6] highlighted in bright pink highlight for emphasis in addition to a hand written note stating the following on bright yellow sticky note paper;

“GIVE TO MR. FERRON.”

 

[64]  The honurabe Justice Feldman January 30, 2014 Judgment(M43059) seems to be  inconsistent with case law, and PARAMOUNTCY; since she indefinitely adjourned matter M43509 which is a Private Prosecution, and is linked to the honourable Justice Watt.

 

[65] The honorable Justice Feldman's January 29, 2014 Judgment (M42812) seems to be inconsistent with case law and PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS.

 

[66]    Why am I being forced to contravene Section 3.1, Section 127(1), and Section 22.1  of our beloved  CRIMINAL CODE OF CANADA, which respectively states as follows;

Effect of judicial acts

3.1 Unless otherwise provided or ordered, anything done by a court, justice or judge is effective from the moment it is done, whether or not it is reduced to writing.

2002, c. 13, s. 2.

 

Disobeying order of court

127. (1) Every one who, without lawful excuse, disobeys a lawful order made by a court of justice or by a person or body of persons authorized by any Act to make or give the order, other than an order for the payment of money, is, unless a punishment or other mode of proceeding is expressly provided by law, guilty of

(a) an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or

(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.

 

22. (1) Where a person counsels another person to be a party to an offense and that other person is afterwards a party to that offense, the person who counseled is a party to that offense, notwithstanding that the offense was committed in a way different from that which was counseled.

Idem

(2) Every one who counsels another person to be a party to an offense is a party to every offense that the other commits in consequence of the counseling that the person who counselled knew or ought to have known was likely to be committed in consequence of the counselling.

 

Definition of “counsel”

(3) For the purposes of this Act, “counsel” includes procure, solicit or incite.

R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 22;

R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 7.

 

[67]    Why am I being counseled to violate Parliamentary legislation, when I want to act lawfully in accordance with the will of Parliament?

 

[68]    Why am I being forced or pushed into breaking the CRIMINAL CODE OF CANADA?

 

[68]    I REQUIRE A WRITTEN COURT ORDER TO BE FREE FROM THE CONSTRAINTS OF

 Justice Feldman's Judgment on January 30, 2014, and Justice Andre July 8, Judgment, to be able to lawfully participate in legal proceedings in any court in ONTARIO.

 

MS. KRICK PREJUDICING PRIVATE PROSECUTIONS:

[69]  On the 13th day of August 2013 Ms. Krick  for the Crown attempted on at least one occasion to defeat the proper course of justice with the fraudulently procured “VEXATIOUS LITTIGAN” court order; the aforementioned court order was released on July 8, 2013 by the honourable  Justice I. Andre J. after being mislead by Ms. Kathryn Kirkpatrick (BORDEN LADNER GERVAIS LLP) whom is counsel for CROWN AGENTS(YORK REGIONAL POLICE SERVICES ET AL). Kathryn E. Kirkpatrick (BLG File No.:016995.000102) mislead the SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE and a Judicial, in order to pervert the course of justice with the intent of perverting the course of justice...