Ms. Kathryn Kirkpatrick (BORDEN LADNER GERVAIS LLP), FRAUDULENT PROCURED COURT ORDER OF DEATH

...[20] On the 13^th of September 2013, the Honorable Justice Watt dismissed my Private Prosecution matter M42322 while I was requesting to speak to DUTY COUNSEL and never requested an adjournment.

[21] The Honorable Justice Watt never gave me leave and dismissed my Private Prosecution matter M42322 even though I filed all required material for an application, while the CROWN(Ms. Krick) filed no materials except for the RESPONDENT MOTION (M42322) containing a copy of the “VEXATIVE LITIGAN ORDER” the CROWN was attempting to use to defeat my PRIVATE PROSECUTIONS(CR – 12-01264 ET AL).

[22] On the 13^th of December 2013, the Honorable Justice La Forme adjourned motion for direction C56817 (M42921) concerning many missing exhibits (C56817), outstanding TRANSCRIPTS (C56817), the Crown improperly removing C56817 from the COURT OF APPEAL RECORDS without lawful permission, to December 18, 2013.

[23] On the 18^th of December 2013, the Honorable Justice Jurianz excepted my late filing of FACTUM C56817(M42921) concerning many missing exhibits(C56817), outstanding TRANSCRIPTS(C56817), and the Crown(Ms. Krick) improperly removing C56817 from the COURT OF APPEAL RECORDS without lawful permission.

[24] I was not given Proper service or disclosure of the honourable Justice I. Andre J. court order release on July 8^th, 2013.

[26] Pursuant to the COURT OF APPEAL- REGISTRAR's copy of the honourable Justice I. Andre J. court order release on July 8^th, 2013; the COURT OF APPEAL-REGISTRAR received their copy of the said “VEXATIVE ORDER” on October 15, 2013.

[27] Furthermore the Honourable Justice I. Andre J. court order release on July 8^th, 2013, directs for a copy of the same order to be sent to all SUPERIOR COURTS, ALL DIVISIONAL COURT, and the COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO; but oddly, Justice I. Andre J. did not direct for the same court order to be sent to Wayne Ferron, whom the same order is against or affects the most in removing all my legal rights in all courts in all of Ontario.

[28] Justice I. Andre J. orders that a copy of the same order be forthwith delivered to the ONTARIO COURT OF APPEAL, and every region of the SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, and DIVISIONAL COURT; the Honourable Justice I. Andre J. “COURT ORDER” which came to the Applicant's attention on August 20, 2013 at about 6 a.m.. VIA the Crown's(Ms. Krick) unsigned RESPONDENT'S MOTION RECORD(M42322), on August 13, 2012.

[29] The copy of the honourable Justice I. Andre J. typed court order which was located in the Crown's(Ms. Krick) unsigned RESPONDENT'S MOTION RECORD(M42322), was missing significant information, mainly; Parties to Proceeding, Title of Proceeding, and name of originating COURT(AUTHORITY) for the same court order.

[30] On January 15^th, 2014 I requested from the COURT OF APPEAL REGISTRAR a certified copy of ,the honourable Justice I. Andre J. court order release on July 8^th; the Registrar refused to certified the same copied order in their file(M42812) which was not properly disclosed to my person.

[31] On January 15^th, 2014 I discovered that the honourable Justice I. Andre J. written court order release on July 8^th, the honourable Justice I. Andre J. typed court order, and the honourable Justice I. Andre J. REASON FOR JUDGEMENT release on July 17^th were all placed in COURT OF APPEAL file (M42812) without lawful service to my person nor proof of service.

[32] Furthermore, the honourable Justice I. Andre J. written court order release on July 8^th 2013, the honourable Justice I. Andre J. typed court order, and the honourable Justice I. Andre J. REASON FOR JUDGEMENT release on July 17^th 2013, had been in the possession of the COURT OF APPEAL-REGISTRAR’S possession since October 15, 2013.

[33] Pursuant to the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106;

Reasons

393. The Court may deliver reasons for judgment

(a) orally from the bench at the conclusion of the hearing of a proceeding; or

(b) after having reserved judgment at the conclusion of a hearing, by depositing in the Registry written reasons, signed by the judge or prothonotary who delivered them.

Drafting of order

394. (1) Where the Court gives reasons, it may direct one of the parties to prepare for endorsement a draft order to implement the Court's conclusion, approved as to form and content by the other parties or, where the parties cannot agree on the form and content of the order, to bring a motion for judgment in accordance with rule 369.

Pronouncement of judgment

(2) On the return of a motion under subsection (1), the Court shall settle the terms of and pronounce the judgment, which shall be endorsed in writing and signed by the presiding judge or prothonotary.

Copies to be sent

395. (1) Subject to subsection 36(3), the Administrator shall send without delay a copy of every order made and of any reasons given other than in open court to all parties

(a) by registered mail;

(b) by electronic means, including facsimile and electronic mail; or

(c) by any other means, as directed by the Chief Justice, likely to bring the order and any reasons to the attention of the party.

Proof of receipt

(2) If an order and any reasons are transmitted by electronic means, the Administrator shall confirm receipt by the party and place proof of that receipt on the Court file.

SOR/2010-177, s. 6.

[34] The aforementioned requirements of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 has not been fulfilled.

[35] Pursuant to THE COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH ACT

(C.C.S.M. c. C280) ;

WHEN PROCEEDINGS MAY BE HEARD

In absence of opposite party

3.03(2) No motion, reference, examination, assessment of costs or other matter, except a motion made without notice, shall proceed before a judge, master or other officer in the absence of the opposite party until 15 minutes after the time fixed for it.

[36] Pursuant to Practice Direction Concerning Civil Appeals in the Court of Appeal (filed with the Secretary of the Civil Rules Committee on October 7, 2003);

5.3 Confirmation of Motion

1. A party who makes a motion on notice to another party shall :
(a) confer or attempt to confer with the other party;
(b) not later than 2 p.m. two days before the hearing date, give the Registrar a confirmation of motion (Form 37B, below, or as set out in the Rules of Civil Procedure) by sending it by fax, (416-327-5032), by e-mail (COA.E-file), or by leaving it at the court office; and
(c) send a copy of the confirmation of motion to the other party by fax or e-mail.2. If no confirmation is given, the motion shall not be heard, except by order of the court.3.A party who has given a confirmation of motion and later determines that the confirmation is no longer correct shall immediately give the Registrar a corrected confirmation of motion (Form 37B) and send a copy of the corrected confirmation of motion to the other party.

[37] I Wayne Ferron, have requested of the COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO, a certified copy of the Honourable Justice I. Andre J. court order release on July 8^th, 2013 by formal written REQUESTION; there was no response to my written REQUESTION, and I have been refused a certified copy by the same REGISTRAR on more than one occasions.

[38] I Wayne Ferron, have requested of the SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE(CENTRAL WEST REGION), a certified copy of the Honourable Justice I. Andre J. court order release on July 8^th, 2013 by formal REQUESTION; there was no response to my written REQUESTION,

[39] I Wayne Ferron, have requested of the SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE(CENTRAL WEST REGION), a certified copy of the proof of receipt for the Honourable Justice I. Andre J. court order release on July 8^th, 2013 by formal REQUESTION; there was no response to my written REQUESTION.

[40] I Wayne Ferron, have requested of the SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (CENTRAL WEST REGION), a certified copy of the confirmation of motion (CV 13-1060) before the Honourable Justice I. Andre J. by formal REQUESTION; there was no response to my written REQUESTION.

[41] Pursuant to RULE 59.02 of RULES OF CIVIL PRACTICE;

ENDORSEMENT BY JUDGE OR OFFICER

59.02 (1) An endorsement of every order shall be made on the appeal book and compendium, record, notice of motion or notice of application by the court, judge or officer making it, unless the circumstances make it impractical to do so. R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 194, r. 59.02 (1); O. Reg. 19/03, s. 10.

(2) Where written reasons are delivered,

(a) in an appellate court, an endorsement is not required;

(b) in any other court, the endorsement may consist of a reference to the reasons,

and a copy of the reasons shall be filed in the court file. R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 194, r. 59.02 (2).

[42] Pursuant to RULE 59.03 of the RULES OF CIVIL PRACTICE;

PREPARATION AND FORM OF ORDER

Preparation of Draft Formal Order

59.03 (1) Any party affected by an order may prepare a draft of the formal order and send it to all other parties represented at the hearing for approval of its form. R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 194, r. 59.03 (1);

[43] I Wayne Ferron, have requested of the Ms. Kirpatrick, a copy of the confirmation for the motion (CV 13-1060) before the Honourable Justice I. Andre J..

[44] I Wayne Ferron, have requested of the Ms. Kirpatrick, a copy of the proof of evidence use to convince the Honourable Justice I. Andre J. that I have or may have had legal proceedings at any DIVISIONAL COURT in ONTARIO. Take Notice: I have not yet or never had a legal proceeding at a DIVISIONAL COURT!

[45] I Wayne Ferron, have requested of the Ms. Kirpatrick, to cross examine AFFIDAVIT OF BRADBURY FERRON V. R.; court file No. 07-22259(S.C.J.) Ms. Kathryn E Kirkpatrick filed with the SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE(CENTRAL WEST REGION)-REGISTRA, and which she used as proof or evidence to persuade the Honourable Justice I. Andre J. that I am a VEXATIVE LITIGANT by formal REQUESTION; Ms. Kirkpatrick failed to attend the March 5, 2014 Hearing even though she promised Justice Feldman on January 29, 2014 that she would be attending. Also affiant Bradbury fail to show to assist the COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO.

[46] Ms. Kathryn E. Kirkpatrick who is counsel for YORK REGIONAL POLICE SERVICES et al failed to attend motion M42812 before the honourable Justice Felman on January 29^th, 2014.

Similarly, Ms. Kathryn E. Kirkpatrick who is counsel for YORK REGIONAL POLICE SERVICES et al failed to attend HEARING M42812 on March 5^th, 2014 after promising the honourable Justice Felman on January 29^th, 2014 that she would do so, after being called by a CLEARK of the COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO over the speaker phone on January 29^th, 2014, Ms. Kathryn E. Kirkpatrick was offered an adjournment despite her nonattendance on January 29^th, 2014 while the honourable Justice Feldman was seized with the same legal matter(M42812).

[47] The honourable Justice Horigan confirmed on March 5, 2014 the Honourable Justice I. Andre J. court order release on July 8^th, 2013 by asserting from the bench in open court that;

“Justice I. Andre J. was absolutely right”

Without the presentation of real evidence or the TRANSCRIPTS OF PROCEEDING (CV 13-1060), for which I was denied an adjournment to obtain for the purpose of assisting the court.

[48] The honourable Justice Feldman confirmed on January 30, 2014 the Honourable Justice I. Andre J. court order release on July 8^th, 2013 by asserting from the bench in open court that;

“...you are a vexation litigant! I am staying the matter...”

While matter M43059 was before her to be heard or she was seized by the same matter, and the Crown had failed to file a RESPONDENT FACTUM(M43059) or any material to assist the court.

[49] Matter M43059 is concerning a PRIVATE PROSECUTION appeal from the honourable JUSTICE WATT dismissed of M42322.

[50] Furthermore, the honourable Justice K. Feldman directs the following in her January 30, 2014 endorsement;

“Mr. Ferron is seeking an extension of time to appeal a decesion of Justice Healey of the New Market Superior Court. However, Mr. Ferron is not entitled to bring any proceedings without the authorization of the Regional Senior Justice because of the vexatious litigant order of Andre' J. of June 2013.

Mr. Ferron is seeking to appeal that order. Until the appeal is resolved, that order is in effect and must be adhere to. Therefore this matter is adjourned sine die to be brough back on only if and when the vexatious litigant order is set aside or with the authorization or the REGIONAL Senor Justice as per the order of Justice Andre'.”

[51] Pursuant to the honourable Justice I. Andre J. court order release on July 8^th, 2013 under the tittle APPENDIX “A”;

“[1] THIS COURT DECLARES that Wayne Ferron has persistently and without reasonable grounds instituted vexatious proceedings and conducted proceedings in a vexatious manner in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, the Divisional Court, and the Ontario Court of Appeal, within the meaning of sections 140(1)(a ) and (b) of the Court Of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, C. C.43”

[2] THE COURT PROHIBITS Wayne Ferron either directly or indirectly, from instituting any proceeding or continuing any proceedings previously instituted in any court in Ontario, except until such time as he obtain leave pursuant to section 140(3) of the Courts of Justice Act and as provided for in this order.

[3] THIS COURT DIRECTS that any such application for leave will be in writing and sent by fax or registered mail to the Regional Senior Justice of Central West Region (the “RSJ”) ex parte, which shall be accompanied by an affidavit that outlines the merits of the proposed proceeding or step, and a copy of this ORDER. The application and affidavit shall not exceed 10 pages in length. The application and affidavit shall not exceed 10 pages in length. The the application for leave will be determined by the RSJ or her designee, who will

(i) give direction as to the service of the application, which shall include service on the Attorney General, and the procedure for the determination of the application, or

(ii) dismiss the application.

[4] THIS COURT ORDERS that any service on the Attorney General that directed by RSJ or her designee referred to in paragraph 3 of this Order shall only be given by registered mail addressed and sent as follows:

Attorney General of Ontario

c/o Legal Director of the Crown Law Office-Civil

8^th Floor, 720 Bay Street

Toronto, Ontario, M7A 2S9

[5] THIS COURT FURTHER ORDERS that should Wayne Ferron file materials seeking to commence or continue a proceeding or any appeal in any court in Ontario without first filing and an entered Order Permitting him to do so; the proceeding shall be immediately stayed upon any person filing a copy of this Order in such court.

[6] THIS COURT FURTHER ORDERS that no further proceedings will be accepted from Wayne Ferron for filing or scheduling by any court in Ontario without the approval of the RSJ or her designate.

[7] THIS COURT FURTHER ORDERS that a copy of this Order be forthwith delivered to the Ontario Court of Appeal and every region of the Superior Court of Justice and Divisional Court.

[8] Cost in the amount of $3, 000 inclusive to go in favour of the applicant.”

[52] The honourable Justice Watt's March 26, 2014 directions(C55532-STATUS COURT) seems to be inconsistent with the application of Justice Andre' “VEXATIVE ORDER”, Justice Feldman's January 30, 2014 Judgment(M43059), and the CRIMINAL CODE OF CANADA(Section 482(1), Section 127, Section 22.1); the same direction is requesting I file Appeal Book(C55532) even though proper CERTIFIED TRANSCRIPTS(55532) which adhere to the rule of evidence has not been completed or affected by court reporter Joy Webster.

[53] On March 26^th, 2014, I filed Justice .I. Andre J. “COURT ORDER” in court while before the honorable Justice Watt, and I informed the same court that it was a contravention of the CRIMINAL CODE OF CANADA(S. 127, S. 22.1) to bring the Applicant to court to participate in a legal proceeding or force the Applicant to participate in a legal proceeding in addition to the same Applicant having no legal rights in ONTARIO.

[54] Furthermore, I informed the honourable Justice Watt that the matter concerning Justice Andre' “VEXATIVE ORDER” has been sent or is being sent to the SUPREME COURT OF CANADA since the COURT OF APPEAL-REGISTRAR has rejected or returned the Application MOTION BEFORE A PANEL while acting in the capacity of a Judge.

[55] Furthermore, the COURT OF APPEAL-REGISTRAR failed or refuse to schedule MOTION FOR DIRECTION(C56817) to remedy missing exhibits from file C56817, determine status of incomplete TRANSCRIPS(C56817), and remedy MS. Krick improper removal of court file C56817 from the COURT OF APPEAL-RECORDS without a court order.

[56] On the 13^th of August 2013, Assistant Crown Attorney Deborah Krick whom has carriage, and control of matter M42322, admitted in open court to having possession of COURT OF APPEAL file C56817; she promised to return it to the COURT OF APPEAL RECORDS, and has done so. She has had sufficient time to review file C56817 and cannot justify asserting any false statements she aught to know is false in contravention of the PROFESSIONAL RULES OF CONDUCT.

[57] Pursuant to Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106;

Inspection of files

26. (1) Where the necessary facilities are available, any person may, with supervision and without interfering with the business of the Court, inspect a Court file or annex

Removal of documents from file

(2) Nothing shall be removed from a Court file or annex except

(a) under an order of the Court;

(b) by an officer of the Registry acting in the course of his or her duties; or

Removal of files

(3) Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, no Court file or annex to a Court file shall be removed from the Registry by any person other than

(a) a judge, prothonotary or referee; or

(b) an officer of the Registry acting in the course of his or her duties.

SOR/2002-417, s. 3.

Definition

26.1 (1) In this rule, “appeal” includes an appeal of an order of a prothonotary, an application for leave to appeal and an appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada.

Removal of exhibits from file

(2) Subject to subsection (4), exhibits put into evidence shall remain in the Court file either

(a) until the time for an appeal has expired, if no appeal has been taken, or

(b) until the appeal is disposed of, if an appeal has been taken.

Return of exhibits

(3) On the expiry of the time for appeal or on the disposition of the appeal, the Administrator shall return the exhibits to the respective solicitors or the parties who put the exhibits in evidence.

Return on consent

(4) At any time following judgment, on requisition by the solicitor or party who put an exhibit in evidence or the person who produced it and on the filing of the consent of all parties, the Administrator shall return the exhibit to the person making the requisition.

SOR/2002-417, s. 4.

[58] Justice Watt's February 26^th, 2014 directions(C55532) seems to be inconsistent with Justice Andre' “VEXATIVE ORDER”, Justice Feldman's January 30, 2014 Judgment(M43059), and the CRIMINAL CODE OF CANADA(Section 482(1), Section 127, Section 22.1).

[59] On February 26^th, 2014 I informed court while before Justice Watt in open court that I have been determined to be a “VEXATIVE LITIGANT.”

[60] On or about February 25^th, 2014, the COURT OF APPEAL-REGISTRAR made an unwritten judgment that the Applicant was a “VEXATIVE LITIGAN”, and there after stop receiving or filing court materials from the APPLICANT in a normal fashion. If court documents are accepted, they seem to be set aside in addition there seem to be no entering of motions or scheduling of motions for directions; yet the honourable Justice Watt expects me to engage in proceedings and perfect appeals.

[61] The honourable Justice Hourigan on March 5, 2014 Judgment(M42812) seems to be inconsistent with the application of Justice Andre' “VEXATIVE ORDER,” since the same order directs that there is no appeal against the order.

[62] On March 5^th , 2014 the COURT OF APPEAL-REGISTRAR made an unwritten judgment, and determined that I was a “VEXATIVE LITIGAN”, and returned my supporting court materials(NOTICE OF MOTION BEFORE A PANEL, FACTUM, MOTION RECORD) for a motion before the panel returnable on February 25, 2014 in addition to failing to file MOTION FOR DIRECTION(C56817); pursuant to Justice Feldman January 30, 2014 ENDOURSEMENT and Justice .I. Andre J. “COURT ORDER” determine me to be a “VEXATIVE LITIGAN”.

[63] A copy of Justice Feldman Endorsement, and Justice .I. Andre J. “COURT ORDER” was given to the Applicant with Para [2] and Para[6] highlighted in bright pink highlight for emphasis in addition to a hand written note stating the following on bright yellow sticky note paper;

“GIVE TO MR. FERRON.”

[64] The honurabe Justice Feldman January 30, 2014 Judgment(M43059) seems to be inconsistent with case law, and PARAMOUNTCY; since she indefinitely adjourned matter M43509 which is a Private Prosecution, and is linked to the honourable Justice Watt.

[65] The honorable Justice Feldman's January 29, 2014 Judgment (M42812) seems to be inconsistent with case law and PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS.

[66] Why am I being forced to contravene Section 3.1, Section 127(1), and Section 22.1 of our beloved CRIMINAL CODE OF CANADA, which respectively states as follows;

Effect of judicial acts

3.1 Unless otherwise provided or ordered, anything done by a court, justice or judge is effective from the moment it is done, whether or not it is reduced to writing.

2002, c. 13, s. 2.

Disobeying order of court

127. (1) Every one who, without lawful excuse, disobeys a lawful order made by a court of justice or by a person or body of persons authorized by any Act to make or give the order, other than an order for the payment of money, is, unless a punishment or other mode of proceeding is expressly provided by law, guilty of

(a) an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or

(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.

22. (1) Where a person counsels another person to be a party to an offense and that other person is afterwards a party to that offense, the person who counseled is a party to that offense, notwithstanding that the offense was committed in a way different from that which was counseled.

Idem

(2) Every one who counsels another person to be a party to an offense is a party to every offense that the other commits in consequence of the counseling that the person who counselled knew or ought to have known was likely to be committed in consequence of the counselling.

Definition of “counsel”

(3) For the purposes of this Act, “counsel” includes procure, solicit or incite.

R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 22;

R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 7.

[67] Why am I being counseled to violate Parliamentary legislation, when I want to act lawfully in accordance with the will of Parliament?

[68] Why am I being forced or pushed into breaking the CRIMINAL CODE OF CANADA?

[68] I REQUIRE A WRITTEN COURT ORDER TO BE FREE FROM THE CONSTRAINTS OF Justice Feldman's Judgment on January 30, 2014, and Justice Andre July 8, Judgment, to be able to lawfully participate in legal proceedings in any court in ONTARIO.

MS. KRICK PREJUDICING PRIVATE PROSECUTIONS:

[69] On the 13^th day of August 2013 Ms. Krick for the Crown attempted on at least one occasion to defeat the proper course of justice with the fraudulently procured “VEXATIOUS LITTIGAN” court order; the aforementioned court order was released on July 8, 2013 by the honourable Justice I. Andre J. after being mislead by Ms. Kirkpatrick whom is counsel for CROWN AGENTS(YORK REGIONAL POLICE SERVICES ET AL).

[70] On the 30^th day of January 2014 Ms. Krick for the Crown asserted on at least one occasion in open court while before the honourable Justice Feldman who was seized by M43059 and adjourned the same Private Prosecution(M43059) indefinitely; that participation of Wayne Ferron in the February 26, 2014 status court HEARING(C55532) would not be in violation of Justice I. Andre J. “COURT ORDER” released on July 8, 2013 or contravention of the “VEXATIVE LITIGANT” order which removed all of Wayne Ferron's legal rights in Ontario.

[71] Pursuant to the honourable Justice I. Andre J. court order release on July 8^th, 2013 under the tittle APPENDIX “A”;

{...}

[7] THIS COURT FURTHER ORDERS that a copy of this Order be forthwith delivered to the Ontario Court of Appeal and every region of the Superior Court of Justice and Divisional Court.

[8] Cost in the amount of $3, 000 inclusive to go in favour of the applicant.”

”

[72] On the 30^th day of January 2014 Ms. Krick for the Crown whiled before Justice Feldman, promised the honourable court that all outstanding TRANSCRIPTS(C55532) for PRIVATE PROSECUTION(C55532) would be completed for the STATUS COURT HEARING(55532) on February 26, 2014; which was not the case for the aforementioned.

[73] Furthermore, on the 26^th day of February 2014 Ms. Krick for the Crown failed to attend the STATUS COURT HEARING(55532) in addition to proper certified copies of all outstanding TRANSCRIPTS(C55532) not being completed in accordance with MS. Krick promised to the COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO on the 30^th day of January 2014 while she was before Justice Feldman.

[74] On the 26^th day of February 2014 the CROWN who was not being represented by Ms. Krick requested of the STATUS COURT for Wayne Ferron to file APPEAL BOOK(C55532), even-though the CROWN should know or ought to have known that APPEAL BOOK(C55532) is dependent on outstanding TRANSCRIPTS(C55532) that the CROWN promised the court would be completed, but was not completed.

[75] Even though the COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO failed to provide DUTY COUNSEL after being requested to do so on the 26^th day of February 2014, in addition to the COURT OF APPEAL-REGISTRAR promising my person (Wayne Ferron) access to DUTY COUNSEL to assist the court, the honourable Justice Watt made a date of March 26, 2014 for the filing of APPEAL BOOK (C55532) with a openly stated comment of “moving the matter along.”

INSERCH OF A CERTIFIED/OFFICIAL COPY OF “VEXATIVE ORDER”:

[76] After being refused a CERTIFIED OR OFFICIAL COPY of the honourable Justice I. Andre J. “COURT ORDER” released on July 8, 2013, by the SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE(CENTRAL WEST)-REGISTRAR and the COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO-REGISTRAR, after official re questions were made; I was finally able to obtain a certified copy of the honourable Justice I. Andre J. “COURT ORDER” released on July 8, 2013, at the SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE(CENTRAL WEST)-REGISTRAR on March 13, 2014 at 9:50 a.m. for a fee with Receipt Number 51088562.

[77] The original copy of the honourable Justice I. Andre J. “COURT ORDER” released on July 8, 2013, and being fully enforced by all courts in Ontario, at the SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE(CENTRAL WEST)-REGISTRAR seems to be written with 3 different and distant pens, mainly;

1. an extra fine tipped black ink pen;

2. a dark blue ink pen;

3. and a light blue ink pen.

[78] I note that PARA[8] of “APENDEX A” the honourable Justice I. Andre J. “COURT ORDER” released on July 8, 2013 is the only addition or modification initialized by Justice I. Andre.

[79] Pursuant to the SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE(CENTRAL WEST)-REGISTRAR, the honourable Justice I. Andre J. “COURT ORDER” released on July 8, 2013, “is not a court order,” but an endorsement which still “stands”. Furthermore, the said endorsement has not went through the process of becoming a court order, mainly; being typed up by the requesting party, and the court's official seal being added to the said document.

[80] On March 13, 2014 at the SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE(CENTRAL WEST)-REGISTRAR, I purchased(Receipt Number 51088562) copies of the following court documents for CV 13-1060 for $58.00;

1. the honourable Justice I. Andre J. “COURT ORDER” released on July 8, 2013 in addition to the typed version of the same “COURT ORDER”, consisting of two pages with the title “APPENDIX A”. The said order is one page and written with 3 different and distant pens ;

2. the NOTICE OF APPLICATION(CV 13-1060) consisting of 23 pages and does not have a crimped COURT SEAL, but however is stamped by the Local Registrar(Samantha Moellar);

3. the honourable Justice I. Andre J. “COURT ORDER” released on March 27, 2013 ;

4. the honourable Justice I. Andre J. REASONS FOR JUDGEMENT released on July 17, 2013 , consisting of 16 pages.

[81] On March 19, 2014 at the SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE(CENTRAL WEST)-REGISTRAR, I purchased(Receipt Number 51093069) copies of the following court documents for CV 13-1060 for $40.00;

1. the NOTICE OF APPLICATION(CV 13-1060) consisting of 23 pages and does not have a crimped COURT SEAL, but however is stamped as issued by the Local Registrar(Samantha Moellar);

2. the honourable Justice I. Andre J. “COURT ORDER” released on March 27, 2013 for ALTERNATIVE SERVICE;

3. the honourable Justice I. Andre J. REASONS FOR JUDGEMENT released on July 17, 2013 , consisting of 16 pages.

[82] Pursuant to the honourable Justice I. Andre J. ENDORSEMENT(CV 13-1060) released on July 08, 2013 , at line 4 to line 7 despite being already served 2 NOTIFICATION OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS(CV 12-716) ;

“...The Applicant served Mr. Ferron with the Application and supporting materials on June 17, 2013 at his address and by email...”

[83] Pursuant to the honourable Justice I. Andre J. REASONS FOR JUDGEMENT(CV 13-1060) released on July 17, 2013 , on page 2, at line 7 to line 9 despite being already served 2 NOTIFICATION OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS(CV 12-716) ;

“...The respondent did not attend the hearing despite having been served with the Application and related materials...”

[84] NOTICE OF APPLICATION(CV 13-1060) consisting of 23 pages and has no crimped COURT SEAL, but is stamped as issued by the Local Registrar(Samantha Moellar); filed on March 11, 2013 and address to Wayne Ferron at the following address on page 2 of the same APPLICATION(CV 13-1060) despite being already served a NOTIFICATION OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS(CV 12-716);

“To WAYNE FERRON

322 Derry Rd. #3

Mississauga, Ontario

L5N 8G5

Email: ferronwayne@gmail.com”

[85] FACTUM(CV 13-1060) consist of 30 pages. Filed on March 14, 2013.

[86] BOOK OF AUTHORITIES(CV 13-1060) consist of at least 300 pages. Filed on March 14, 2013. How are the integrity of material insured in email service maintained, that requires numerous physical tabs for various volumes consisting of hundreds of pages?

[87] MOTION RECORD(CV 13-1060) is four VOLUMES(3 inch binding or greater), consisting of more than 1, 500 pages. Filed on March 14, 2013. How are the integrity of material insured in email service that requires numerous physical tabs for various volumes consisting of hundreds of pages?

[88] Kinkos charges $00.20 per/min for computer use and $00.19 per/printed page in addition to the cost of binding materials with tabs. How are the integrity of material insured in email service that requires numerous physical tabs for various volumes consisting of hundreds of pages?

[89] On the 16^th of January 2014 at 11:14 a.m., I served upon HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN in right of ONTARIO(as represented by the Attorney General of Ontario), the following documents:

1. a copy of AMENDED AMENDED NOTICE OF MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME for APPEAL FOR APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL(M42812);

2. MOTION FOR DIRECTION;

3. a copy of AFFIDAVIT OF WAYNE FERRON FOR CR-12-1912 ET AL, BRAMPTON COURT;

4. a copy of STATEMENT OF CLAIM FOR CV-11-4493;

5. a copy of MOTION RECORD/BOOK OF AUTHORITIES FOR EXTENSION OF TIME;

6. VICTIM IMPACT STATEMENT FOR CR-12-1912 ET AL;

by leaving a signed copy of each of the aforemention 6 documents with an Appeal Clerk(whom refused to give name, said it is his right), an employee at the MINISTRY OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL(Provincial), who excepts service on behalf of the ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO at the following location;

Crown Counsel: Deborah Krick

The Attorney General of Ontario

CRIMINAL LAW BRANCH

6th floor

720 Bay Street

Toronto, Ontario M5G 2K1

fax: 416 326 4015

[90] On the 16^th of January 2014 at 10:31 a.m., I served upon YORK REGIONAL POLICE SERVICES(as represented by BORDEN LADNER GERVAIS LLP(BLG)), the following documents:

1. a copy of AMENDED AMENDED NOTICE OF MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME for APPEAL FOR APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL(M42812);

2. MOTION FOR DIRECTION;

3. a copy of AFFIDAVIT OF WAYNE FERRON FOR CR-12-1912 ET AL, BRAMPTON COURT;

4. a copy of STATEMENT OF CLAIM FOR CV-11-4493;

5. a copy of MOTION RECORD/BOOK OF AUTHORITIES FOR EXTENSION OF TIME;

6. VICTIM IMPACT STATEMENT FOR CR-12-1912 ET AL;

by leaving a signed copy of each of the aforemention 6 documents with Kim Parsons, an employee at BORDEN LADNER GERVAIS LLP(BLG)), who excepts legal service on behalf of BLG and Kathryn E. Kirkpatrick (a BLG Lawyer for the said defendant) at the folowing location;

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Scotia Plaza, 40 King Street W

Toronto, ON, Canada M5H 3Y4

T 416.367.6000

F 416.367.6749

blg.com

Counsel for Defendants;

REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK;

YORK REGIONAL POLICE SERVICES

Counsel: Kathryn E Kirkpatrick(BLG File No.:016995.000102 )

T 416.367.6092

F 416.361.2769

cfotopoulos@blg.com ...

wAYNE fERRON

lEEGAL POET

There are no posts in this folder...

PostPoems Be Artistic. Be Creative. Be Inspired!

Author Information