A Journey Through Ethics and Misunderstandings

Folder Contents

Author's Full Portfolio



This is merely an introduction to the following collection of poems I have recently penned on the subject. It has been included to provide a little background for those who may not be familiar with the subject. 


In the labyrinth of medical history, a winding trail of misconceptions and misinterpretations emerges. The oft-cited phrase "first, do no harm" is commonly thought to originate from the Hippocratic Oath of ancient Greece.


However, it likely originated in the 17th century in England. This demonstrates language's fascinating—and sometimes misleading—evolution as it moves from ancient Greek to Latin, eventually reaching our modern tongues. This transformation has carved out both clarity and confusion in the realm of medical ethics.


The Origins: A Myth Debunked


The notion of "primum non nocere" is widely attributed to Thomas Sydenham, although even this claim lacks definitive proof. The original texts from Hippocrates, composed in ancient Greek, "ὀφελέειν ἢ μὴ βλάπτειν" (To benefit, or at least do no harm), conveyed a more intricate view of balancing the scales of benefit and harm. Yet, this historical haze invites a spectrum of interpretations, leaving room for both understanding and, regrettably, exploitation.


Modern Medical Ethics: A Tightrope Walk



Today's healthcare professionals carefully navigate a tightrope stretched between beneficence and non-maleficence. Bound by rigorous ethical standards and evidence-based practices, they must consistently evaluate the potential gains against the risks involved. While this cautious approach is fundamentally sound, it can sometimes be perceived as excessive by those yearning for immediate solutions.


The Exploitation Gap: A Double-Edged Sword


Ironically, the principles that uphold ethical medical practices can create gaps for exploitation. Genuine practitioners skillfully maneuver through complex risk-benefit landscapes, while opportunistic individuals take advantage of the public's yearning for straightforward answers and miracle cures. These charlatans thrive in the shadows, between established medical truths and public perception.


A Broader Impact: Beyond Medicine


The implications of "do no harm" extend far beyond the parameters of medicine, resonating in several critical areas:

- Environmental efforts: Guiding conservation practices to protect our planet.
 
- Business ethics: Shaping decisions that consider moral implications.
 
- Humanitarian endeavours: Responding judiciously to the challenges of climate change.
 
- Legal contexts: Navigating the intricacies of medical malpractice laws.

 


This principle’s adaptability underscores its timeless relevance while highlighting the potential for misinterpretation as it adapts to different fields.


In this ongoing journey, the essence of "do no harm" continues to provoke thought and discussion, reminding us of the delicate balance required in practice and principle.